Machine Learning for Detecting DoS Attack: A Comparative Approach

Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks has been a critical challenge in cybersecurity, disrupting the availability of network services and causing significant operational and economic losses. To ascertain the most suitable approaches to mitigate to dilemma, this study compares the effectiveness of some selected machine learning models in identifying denial-of-service (DoS) attacks. Two ensemble learning models, Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), showed remarkable accuracy and dependability. RF performed almost perfectly on criteria including accuracy (99%), precision (99%), and recall (99%). Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) stood out as Deep Learning models, capturing complex patterns with CNN achieving an accuracy of 98% and a perfect AUC score of 1.00. The models utilized the Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) to select significant features and ensured proper data balancing techniques for robust model training and evaluation, minimizing overfitting and enhancing generalization. The results highlight RF and CNN as the best-performing models, with RF offering interpretability and computational efficiency, while CNN excels in handling unstructured and complex datasets. This study underscores the need for context-driven model selection and suggests exploring hybrid approaches that integrate the strengths of ML and DL for improved DoS attack detection. Future work should aim to enhance scalability and adaptability for real-world cybersecurity applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Computer Networking and Information Technology
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52589/bjcnit-i0v0hk0y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning for Detecting DoS Attack: A Comparative Approach

Oluwabamise J. Adeniyi, B. G. Akwaronwu, I. U. Akwaronwu
1 citations
British Journal of Computer Networking and Information Technology
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
1.49
article

Machine Learning for Detecting DoS Attack: A Comparative Approach

Oluwabamise J. Adeniyi, B. G. Akwaronwu, I. U. Akwaronwu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks has been a critical challenge in cybersecurity, disrupting the availability of network services and causing significant operational and economic losses. To ascertain the most suitable approaches to mitigate to dilemma, this study compares the effectiveness of some selected machine learning models in identifying denial-of-service (DoS) attacks. Two ensemble learning models, Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), showed remarkable accuracy and dependability. RF performed almost perfectly on criteria including accuracy (99%), precision (99%), and recall (99%). Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) stood out as Deep Learning models, capturing complex patterns with CNN achieving an accuracy of 98% and a perfect AUC score of 1.00. The models utilized the Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) to select significant features and ensured proper data balancing techniques for robust model training and evaluation, minimizing overfitting and enhancing generalization. The results highlight RF and CNN as the best-performing models, with RF offering interpretability and computational efficiency, while CNN excels in handling unstructured and complex datasets. This study underscores the need for context-driven model selection and suggests exploring hybrid approaches that integrate the strengths of ML and DL for improved DoS attack detection. Future work should aim to enhance scalability and adaptability for real-world cybersecurity applications.

British Journal of Computer Networking and Information TechnologyVol. 8(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.