Aromatase inhibitors therapy and major osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: a nationwide real-world cohort study

The increased risk of fractures associated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) therapy has been well established in clinical trials; however, data on Asian populations remain limited. Furthermore, the impact of AIs on fracture risk across different age groups and breast cancer stages has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to assess the association between AIs therapy and major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) in postmenopausal Taiwanese women with breast cancer using real-world data. We used Taiwan’s National Health Insurance and Cancer Registry databases to identify women aged ≥ 50 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer who received continuous AIs (N = 1,835) or tamoxifen (TAM) (N = 1,868) treatment. MOFs requiring hospitalization were tracked through 2019. The mean follow-up duration was 47.49 months (SD = 29.73) for the AIs group and 72.49 months (SD = 37.22) for the TAM group. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). MOFs incidence in AIs users compared to TAM users, with secondary outcomes including fractures of the spine, hip, humerus, and forearm. AIs users had a higher incidence of MOFs than TAM users. After adjustment, AIs therapy significantly increased forearm fracture risk [adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.24–3.76)]. In age-stratified analyses, women aged 50–65 years had a notably higher risk of hip fractures (aHR = 5.65, 95% CI: 1.55–20.68) and forearm fractures (aHR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.55–6.36) compared with TAM users, while no significant difference was observed in women over 65 years. Among early-stage (0–1) patients, AIs use was associated with a higher risk of hip fractures (aHR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.10–8.97). In later-stage (2–3) patients, AIs use was linked to a higher risk of forearm fractures (aHR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.11–5.20). Additionally, even among low-risk groups, AIs users had a significantly higher fracture risk than TAM users (p = 0.040). AIs therapy significantly increased the risk of hip and forearm fractures compared to TAM, particularly in women aged 50–65 years and in specific cancer stages. Regular bone mineral density monitoring and personalized bone-protective strategies are recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Cancer Research
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02050-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Estrogen and related hormone effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aromatase inhibitors therapy and major osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: a nationwide real-world cohort study

Hsin‐Yi Yang, Chun‐Ying Wu, Paiyu Liu, Ching-Fang Tsai et al.
1 citations
Breast Cancer Research
Estrogen and related hormone effects
1.82
article

Aromatase inhibitors therapy and major osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: a nationwide real-world cohort study

Hsin‐Yi Yang, Chun‐Ying Wu, Paiyu Liu, Ching-Fang Tsai, Yu‐Chen Hsu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The increased risk of fractures associated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) therapy has been well established in clinical trials; however, data on Asian populations remain limited. Furthermore, the impact of AIs on fracture risk across different age groups and breast cancer stages has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to assess the association between AIs therapy and major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) in postmenopausal Taiwanese women with breast cancer using real-world data. We used Taiwan’s National Health Insurance and Cancer Registry databases to identify women aged ≥ 50 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer who received continuous AIs (N = 1,835) or tamoxifen (TAM) (N = 1,868) treatment. MOFs requiring hospitalization were tracked through 2019. The mean follow-up duration was 47.49 months (SD = 29.73) for the AIs group and 72.49 months (SD = 37.22) for the TAM group. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). MOFs incidence in AIs users compared to TAM users, with secondary outcomes including fractures of the spine, hip, humerus, and forearm. AIs users had a higher incidence of MOFs than TAM users. After adjustment, AIs therapy significantly increased forearm fracture risk [adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.24–3.76)]. In age-stratified analyses, women aged 50–65 years had a notably higher risk of hip fractures (aHR = 5.65, 95% CI: 1.55–20.68) and forearm fractures (aHR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.55–6.36) compared with TAM users, while no significant difference was observed in women over 65 years. Among early-stage (0–1) patients, AIs use was associated with a higher risk of hip fractures (aHR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.10–8.97). In later-stage (2–3) patients, AIs use was linked to a higher risk of forearm fractures (aHR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.11–5.20). Additionally, even among low-risk groups, AIs users had a significantly higher fracture risk than TAM users (p = 0.040). AIs therapy significantly increased the risk of hip and forearm fractures compared to TAM, particularly in women aged 50–65 years and in specific cancer stages. Regular bone mineral density monitoring and personalized bone-protective strategies are recommended.

Breast Cancer ResearchVol. 27(1)
Ministry of Health and Welfare (KR), Chia-Yi Christian Hospital (TW)
Kaohsiung Medical University, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Estrogen and related hormone effects
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.