Bayesian Thurstonian IRT Modeling: Logical Dependencies as an Accurate Reflection of Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment

Thurstonian item response theory (Thurstonian IRT) is a well-established approach to latent trait estimation with forced choice data of arbitrary block lengths. In the forced choice format, test takers rank statements within each block. This rank is coded with binary variables. Since each rank is awarded exactly once per block, stochastic dependencies arise, for example, when options A and B have ranks 1 and 3, C must have rank 2 in a block of length 3. Although the original implementation of the Thurstonian IRT model can recover parameters well, it is not completely true to the mathematical model and Thurstone's law of comparative judgment, as impossible binary answer patterns have a positive probability. We refer to this problem as stochastic dependencies and it is due to unconstrained item intercepts. In addition, there are redundant binary comparisons resulting in what we call logical dependencies, for example, if within a block <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mo><</mml:mo> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mo><</mml:mo> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:math> , then <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mo><</mml:mo> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:math> must follow and a binary variable for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mo><</mml:mo> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:math> is not needed. Since current Markov Chain Monte Carlo approaches to Bayesian computation are flexible and at the same time promise correct small sample inference, we investigate an alternative Bayesian implementation of the Thurstonian IRT model considering both stochastic and logical dependencies. We show analytically that the same parameters maximize the posterior likelihood, regardless of the presence or absence of redundant binary comparisons. A comparative simulation reveals a large reduction in computational effort for the alternative implementation, which is due to respecting both dependencies. Therefore, this investigation suggests that when fitting the Thurstonian IRT model, all dependencies should be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644251335586
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian Thurstonian IRT Modeling: Logical Dependencies as an Accurate Reflection of Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment

Philipp Doebler, Susanne Frick, Hannah Heister
Educational and Psychological Measurement
School Choice and Performance
article

Bayesian Thurstonian IRT Modeling: Logical Dependencies as an Accurate Reflection of Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment

Philipp Doebler, Susanne Frick, Hannah Heister
article en

Abstract

Thurstonian item response theory (Thurstonian IRT) is a well-established approach to latent trait estimation with forced choice data of arbitrary block lengths. In the forced choice format, test takers rank statements within each block. This rank is coded with binary variables. Since each rank is awarded exactly once per block, stochastic dependencies arise, for example, when options A and B have ranks 1 and 3, C must have rank 2 in a block of length 3. Although the original implementation of the Thurstonian IRT model can recover parameters well, it is not completely true to the mathematical model and Thurstone's law of comparative judgment, as impossible binary answer patterns have a positive probability. We refer to this problem as stochastic dependencies and it is due to unconstrained item intercepts. In addition, there are redundant binary comparisons resulting in what we call logical dependencies, for example, if within a block <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mo><</mml:mo> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mo><</mml:mo> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:math> , then <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mo><</mml:mo> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:math> must follow and a binary variable for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mo><</mml:mo> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:math> is not needed. Since current Markov Chain Monte Carlo approaches to Bayesian computation are flexible and at the same time promise correct small sample inference, we investigate an alternative Bayesian implementation of the Thurstonian IRT model considering both stochastic and logical dependencies. We show analytically that the same parameters maximize the posterior likelihood, regardless of the presence or absence of redundant binary comparisons. A comparative simulation reveals a large reduction in computational effort for the alternative implementation, which is due to respecting both dependencies. Therefore, this investigation suggests that when fitting the Thurstonian IRT model, all dependencies should be considered.

Educational and Psychological MeasurementVol. 85(5)
University of Groningen (NL), TU Dortmund University (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.