The climate in Strasbourg – the judgments and their impact on global climate law

The judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in April 2024 represent the Court’s first foray into climate change law. The climate has been the source of much regulation in international law and litigation across the world has proliferated since the 2015 Paris Agreement. How, then, does the Court engage with the specialized regime of the Paris Agreement and UNFCCC in its recent jurisprudence? Is there a potential for this judgment to have an impact on the interpretation of international climate law? The KlimaSeniorinnen judgment is perhaps the most authoritative case of international climate change litigation to date, and has the opportunity to influence the consideration of reoccurring themes in climate litigation. This article will lay out the interaction and potential impacts of these judgments on international law, as well as climate change litigation. It will show that the Court has concretized the position of the Conference of the Parities to the Paris Agreement as a strong, normative influencer in the climate change regime, and the role of courts as protectors of human rights against the adverse effects of climate change is vital.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x251344459
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
47.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The climate in Strasbourg – the judgments and their impact on global climate law

Liam Siry
3 citations
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Environmental law and policy
47.95
article

The climate in Strasbourg – the judgments and their impact on global climate law

Liam Siry
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in April 2024 represent the Court’s first foray into climate change law. The climate has been the source of much regulation in international law and litigation across the world has proliferated since the 2015 Paris Agreement. How, then, does the Court engage with the specialized regime of the Paris Agreement and UNFCCC in its recent jurisprudence? Is there a potential for this judgment to have an impact on the interpretation of international climate law? The KlimaSeniorinnen judgment is perhaps the most authoritative case of international climate change litigation to date, and has the opportunity to influence the consideration of reoccurring themes in climate litigation. This article will lay out the interaction and potential impacts of these judgments on international law, as well as climate change litigation. It will show that the Court has concretized the position of the Conference of the Parities to the Paris Agreement as a strong, normative influencer in the climate change regime, and the role of courts as protectors of human rights against the adverse effects of climate change is vital.

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative LawVol. 32(3)
Maastricht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Environmental law and policy
47.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.