Semitic * <i>ʾilāh</i> - and Hebrew אלהים: From plural ‘gods’ to singular ‘God’

The Biblical Hebrew word אלהים‎ is plural in form. Semantically and syntactically, however, it can be plural or singular. The stem of this noun can be reconstructed as * ʾilāh -. As already noted by Wellhausen, this looks like a broken plural of * ʾil- , the Proto-Semitic word for ‘god’. This article takes Wellhausen’s observation and uses it to explain the plural morphology of Hebrew אלהים‎. I argue that * ʾilāh- should be reconstructed with redundant plural suffixes in some parts of the paradigm. This reconstructed paradigm is preserved virtually unchanged in Archaic Biblical Hebrew. The reconstructed paradigm also explains the almost complete replacement of * ʾil- by * ʾilāh- in Aramaic and Arabic and allows us to reassess the reasons for the association between the lexeme ‘god’ and plural number. Consequently, earlier suggestions that see אלהים‎’s plural number as a reflection of pre-Yahwistic polytheism or as a marker of abstractness are no longer tenable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03090892251332286
Primary Topic
Archaeology and Historical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Semitic * ʾilāh - and Hebrew אלהים: From plural ‘gods’ to singular ‘God’

Benjamin D. Suchard
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
Archaeology and Historical Studies
article

Semitic * ʾilāh - and Hebrew אלהים: From plural ‘gods’ to singular ‘God’

Benjamin D. Suchard
article en

Abstract

The Biblical Hebrew word אלהים‎ is plural in form. Semantically and syntactically, however, it can be plural or singular. The stem of this noun can be reconstructed as * ʾilāh -. As already noted by Wellhausen, this looks like a broken plural of * ʾil- , the Proto-Semitic word for ‘god’. This article takes Wellhausen’s observation and uses it to explain the plural morphology of Hebrew אלהים‎. I argue that * ʾilāh- should be reconstructed with redundant plural suffixes in some parts of the paradigm. This reconstructed paradigm is preserved virtually unchanged in Archaic Biblical Hebrew. The reconstructed paradigm also explains the almost complete replacement of * ʾil- by * ʾilāh- in Aramaic and Arabic and allows us to reassess the reasons for the association between the lexeme ‘god’ and plural number. Consequently, earlier suggestions that see אלהים‎’s plural number as a reflection of pre-Yahwistic polytheism or as a marker of abstractness are no longer tenable.

Journal for the Study of the Old TestamentVol. 49(4)
Leiden University (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Archaeology and Historical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Semitic * <i>ʾilāh</i> - and Hebrew אלהים: From plural ‘gods’ to singular ‘God’ — Benjamin D. Suchard · Journal for the Study of the Old Testament (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS