Task difficulty modulates the effect of mind wandering on phase dynamics

Mind wandering attenuates widespread sensory and motor processing, both of which are mediated by phase coherence. However, it remains unclear i) whether mind wandering impacts both sensory input and motor output processing by modulating ii) neural entrainment to external stimuli, as measured by intertrial phase coherence (ITPC), and specifically iii) whether task difficulty with different degrees of attentional demands moderates the impact of mind wandering on phase coherence. Using the thought-probe method, we assessed participants' attentional states during different sensory and motor tasks with varying task difficulty. We found that mind wandering decreased ITPC exclusively in less demanding tasks but not in difficult ones, regardless of whether the tasks involved visual input or motor output processing. Our results suggest that external task difficulty may modulate the balance between external and internal cognitive processing (e.g., mind wandering), with simpler tasks facilitating internally oriented cognition and increasing mind wandering. This balance between internal mind wandering and external task difficulty is mediated, in part, by phase coherence, which serves as an underlying neural mechanism. Collectively, our findings support the hypothesis that phase coherence and its dynamics (ITPC) play a key role in mediating the reciprocal balance of internal and external cognition-this suggests their partly shared cognitive-executive resources as entailed by the recently proposed Baseline model of cognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2416387122
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Task difficulty modulates the effect of mind wandering on phase dynamics

Xiaolan Fu, Zhengkun Long, Georg Northoff
7 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Mind wandering and attention
10.02
article

Task difficulty modulates the effect of mind wandering on phase dynamics

Xiaolan Fu, Zhengkun Long, Georg Northoff
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Mind wandering attenuates widespread sensory and motor processing, both of which are mediated by phase coherence. However, it remains unclear i) whether mind wandering impacts both sensory input and motor output processing by modulating ii) neural entrainment to external stimuli, as measured by intertrial phase coherence (ITPC), and specifically iii) whether task difficulty with different degrees of attentional demands moderates the impact of mind wandering on phase coherence. Using the thought-probe method, we assessed participants' attentional states during different sensory and motor tasks with varying task difficulty. We found that mind wandering decreased ITPC exclusively in less demanding tasks but not in difficult ones, regardless of whether the tasks involved visual input or motor output processing. Our results suggest that external task difficulty may modulate the balance between external and internal cognitive processing (e.g., mind wandering), with simpler tasks facilitating internally oriented cognition and increasing mind wandering. This balance between internal mind wandering and external task difficulty is mediated, in part, by phase coherence, which serves as an underlying neural mechanism. Collectively, our findings support the hypothesis that phase coherence and its dynamics (ITPC) play a key role in mediating the reciprocal balance of internal and external cognition-this suggests their partly shared cognitive-executive resources as entailed by the recently proposed Baseline model of cognition.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(22)
University of Ottawa (CA), Shenzhen University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre (CA), Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology (CZ), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
University of Ottawa, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shenzhen University, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Mind wandering and attention
10.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.