Identifying metro user experience and inclusivity gaps using service design methods

Social equity is critical to sustainability, and accessibility is a growing issue in many public buildings and vital infrastructure. However, progress towards developing inclusive solutions within the built environment is slow. This study explores how different age and gender groups of frequent commuters experience inclusivity when moving within the public circulation environments within existing underground train stations. Aims are to develop (i) a deeper understanding of the interactions that impact critical customer touchpoints along the passenger journey within existing stations, (ii) synthesise observations with literature, and (iii) new ideas that could be refined and implemented in new studies. The first three stages of the Service design (SD) methodology were transferred (observation, synthesis and new idea). Observations, elicited using a five point Likert questionnaire, probed how vertical and horizontal circulations impact the passengers experience of inclusivity in London’s ‘Tube’ stations. The synthesis led to new ideas. New proxies were created to evaluate inclusivity (comfort, security, confidence, gentleness, and awareness). Vertical Severance described the difficulty of moving within complex deep stations. This research developed the notion that improving new stations could, could address social equity and inclusivity concerns by improving the passenger experience for everyone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.24.00049
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying metro user experience and inclusivity gaps using service design methods

John Harding
2 citations
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
article

Identifying metro user experience and inclusivity gaps using service design methods

John Harding
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Social equity is critical to sustainability, and accessibility is a growing issue in many public buildings and vital infrastructure. However, progress towards developing inclusive solutions within the built environment is slow. This study explores how different age and gender groups of frequent commuters experience inclusivity when moving within the public circulation environments within existing underground train stations. Aims are to develop (i) a deeper understanding of the interactions that impact critical customer touchpoints along the passenger journey within existing stations, (ii) synthesise observations with literature, and (iii) new ideas that could be refined and implemented in new studies. The first three stages of the Service design (SD) methodology were transferred (observation, synthesis and new idea). Observations, elicited using a five point Likert questionnaire, probed how vertical and horizontal circulations impact the passengers experience of inclusivity in London’s ‘Tube’ stations. The synthesis led to new ideas. New proxies were created to evaluate inclusivity (comfort, security, confidence, gentleness, and awareness). Vertical Severance described the difficulty of moving within complex deep stations. This research developed the notion that improving new stations could, could address social equity and inclusivity concerns by improving the passenger experience for everyone.

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering SustainabilityVol. 179(1)
University of Cambridge (GB), Royal Institute of British Architects (GB), Wolfson Foundation (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.