Game-theoretic modeling of sustainable intermodal freight transportation: Optimal pricing and energy efficiency strategies under government intervention and fuzzy uncertainty

Sustainable freight transportation plays a pivotal role in addressing pressing environmental challenges while simultaneously fostering socio-economic development. Governmental entities worldwide are increasingly implementing strategic policy interventions to enhance the sustainability of freight transportation systems. A comprehensive understanding of the complex interactions and dynamics between these policy measures and transportation operations is essential for developing effective sustainable transportation strategies. This study aims to explore the impact of government intervention on pricing strategies, and energy-saving level determination in the transportation sector under conditions of fuzzy uncertainty. While the government looks into three distinct strategies, each with two decision variables, transportation enterprises are considering two alternate scenarios for decision-making. It means that twelve distinct scenarios are being considered by the government. Our analyses reveal that: (1) The government's goals of maximizing social welfare and energy saving cannot be aligned with the enterprises' goals of maximizing profits, regardless of whether decision-making is decentralized or centralized. (2) The carbon cap-and-trade mechanism emerges as the most effective strategy for governmental regulation, whereas transportation enterprises demonstrate optimal responsiveness to subsidy-based policy interventions. (3) Centralized decision-making by transportation enterprises yields superior outcomes across multiple dimensions, including LSSC profitability, social welfare enhancement, and energy conservation efficiency, when contrasted with decentralized decision-making paradigms. (4) The implementation of a carbon cap-and-trade policy by the government, combined with increased investments in environmental awareness and centralized decision-making by transportation enterprises, significantly advances both profit objectives and energy-saving targets.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2025.4.002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Maritime Ports and Logistics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Game-theoretic modeling of sustainable intermodal freight transportation: Optimal pricing and energy efficiency strategies under government intervention and fuzzy uncertainty

Long Qian, WU Qun-qi
1 citations
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
Maritime Ports and Logistics
1.24
article

Game-theoretic modeling of sustainable intermodal freight transportation: Optimal pricing and energy efficiency strategies under government intervention and fuzzy uncertainty

Long Qian, WU Qun-qi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Sustainable freight transportation plays a pivotal role in addressing pressing environmental challenges while simultaneously fostering socio-economic development. Governmental entities worldwide are increasingly implementing strategic policy interventions to enhance the sustainability of freight transportation systems. A comprehensive understanding of the complex interactions and dynamics between these policy measures and transportation operations is essential for developing effective sustainable transportation strategies. This study aims to explore the impact of government intervention on pricing strategies, and energy-saving level determination in the transportation sector under conditions of fuzzy uncertainty. While the government looks into three distinct strategies, each with two decision variables, transportation enterprises are considering two alternate scenarios for decision-making. It means that twelve distinct scenarios are being considered by the government. Our analyses reveal that: (1) The government's goals of maximizing social welfare and energy saving cannot be aligned with the enterprises' goals of maximizing profits, regardless of whether decision-making is decentralized or centralized. (2) The carbon cap-and-trade mechanism emerges as the most effective strategy for governmental regulation, whereas transportation enterprises demonstrate optimal responsiveness to subsidy-based policy interventions. (3) Centralized decision-making by transportation enterprises yields superior outcomes across multiple dimensions, including LSSC profitability, social welfare enhancement, and energy conservation efficiency, when contrasted with decentralized decision-making paradigms. (4) The implementation of a carbon cap-and-trade policy by the government, combined with increased investments in environmental awareness and centralized decision-making by transportation enterprises, significantly advances both profit objectives and energy-saving targets.

International Journal of Industrial Engineering ComputationsVol. 16(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Maritime Ports and Logistics
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.