Comparative Benchmark Analysis of ChatGPT and DeepSeek: Performance Across AI Tasks

ChatGPT and DeepSeek represent two prominent large language models, each offering unique strengths in artificial intelligence applications.ChatGPT is widely known for its advanced conversational abilities and broad language understanding, while DeepSeek is recognized for its strong performance in computational and technical domains.This research paper presents a comparative evaluation of DeepSeek-R1 and ChatGPT across several prominent mathematical and algorithmic benchmarks.The analysis reveals that both models exhibit strong and competitive performance, with each demonstrating unique strengths depending on the benchmark.DeepSeek-R1 shows a slight advantage in advanced mathematical problem-solving, while ChatGPT excels in competitive programming and complex quantitative reasoning tasks.Although the overall performance of the two models is closely matched, notable differences emerge in specific areas, highlighting the importance of selecting the appropriate model based on the requirements of the task.These findings offer valuable insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to deploy large language models in mathematical and computational domains.

Publication Details

Journal
IARJSET
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17148/iarjset.2025.125378
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Benchmark Analysis of ChatGPT and DeepSeek: Performance Across AI Tasks

IARJSET
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Comparative Benchmark Analysis of ChatGPT and DeepSeek: Performance Across AI Tasks

article en

Abstract

ChatGPT and DeepSeek represent two prominent large language models, each offering unique strengths in artificial intelligence applications.ChatGPT is widely known for its advanced conversational abilities and broad language understanding, while DeepSeek is recognized for its strong performance in computational and technical domains.This research paper presents a comparative evaluation of DeepSeek-R1 and ChatGPT across several prominent mathematical and algorithmic benchmarks.The analysis reveals that both models exhibit strong and competitive performance, with each demonstrating unique strengths depending on the benchmark.DeepSeek-R1 shows a slight advantage in advanced mathematical problem-solving, while ChatGPT excels in competitive programming and complex quantitative reasoning tasks.Although the overall performance of the two models is closely matched, notable differences emerge in specific areas, highlighting the importance of selecting the appropriate model based on the requirements of the task.These findings offer valuable insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to deploy large language models in mathematical and computational domains.

IARJSETVol. 12(5)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.