The Role of Generative AI in Automating English Writing Assessment: Benefits and Challenges

The integration of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in English writing assessment has gained considerable attention for its potential to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of evaluations. However, while AI tools like Grammarly and GPT-based platforms have been employed for basic writing assessments, their effectiveness in evaluating more complex writing aspects remains underexplored. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the role of generative AI in automating English writing assessment, focusing on its benefits, challenges, and implications for both students and educators. The research design is a mixed-methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data through surveys and semi-structured interviews. The study involved 100 students and 10 educators from the Faculty of Sharia at UIN Raden Intan Lampung, who had experience using AI-based writing tools. Data was collected through structured surveys and in-depth interviews, as well as by comparing AI-generated writing assessments with human grading. The findings revealed that while AI tools are highly effective in evaluating grammar and structure, they struggle to assess higher-order writing skills, such as content coherence and critical thinking. Both students and educators acknowledged the time-saving benefits of AI tools, but also highlighted the limitations of AI in understanding nuanced writing aspects. The study implies that AI tools can complement traditional assessment methods but should not fully replace human judgment, especially in complex writing tasks. Future research should focus on enhancing AI algorithms to better assess the depth of writing and address ethical concerns regarding data privacy and biases in AI models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LinguaEducare Journal of English and Linguistic Studies
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63324/lec.2v.1i.63
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Generative AI in Automating English Writing Assessment: Benefits and Challenges

S Kartika
1 citations
LinguaEducare Journal of English and Linguistic Studies
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
article

The Role of Generative AI in Automating English Writing Assessment: Benefits and Challenges

S Kartika
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The integration of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in English writing assessment has gained considerable attention for its potential to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of evaluations. However, while AI tools like Grammarly and GPT-based platforms have been employed for basic writing assessments, their effectiveness in evaluating more complex writing aspects remains underexplored. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the role of generative AI in automating English writing assessment, focusing on its benefits, challenges, and implications for both students and educators. The research design is a mixed-methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data through surveys and semi-structured interviews. The study involved 100 students and 10 educators from the Faculty of Sharia at UIN Raden Intan Lampung, who had experience using AI-based writing tools. Data was collected through structured surveys and in-depth interviews, as well as by comparing AI-generated writing assessments with human grading. The findings revealed that while AI tools are highly effective in evaluating grammar and structure, they struggle to assess higher-order writing skills, such as content coherence and critical thinking. Both students and educators acknowledged the time-saving benefits of AI tools, but also highlighted the limitations of AI in understanding nuanced writing aspects. The study implies that AI tools can complement traditional assessment methods but should not fully replace human judgment, especially in complex writing tasks. Future research should focus on enhancing AI algorithms to better assess the depth of writing and address ethical concerns regarding data privacy and biases in AI models.

LinguaEducare Journal of English and Linguistic StudiesVol. 2(1)
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Role of Generative AI in Automating English Writing Assessment: Benefits and Challenges — S Kartika · LinguaEducare Journal of English and Linguistic Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS