Communication Breakdown—Response to “The Social Separation of Old and Young: A Root of Ageism”

This paper responds to Hagestad and Uhlenberg’s seminal work, which illustrates how ageism and spatial segregation of older adults form a vicious cycle. We argue that spatial segregation exacerbates ageism and cognitive decline by causing intergenerational communication breakdowns, generated by senescent sensory decline, stereotype threats, and digital communication barriers. Thus, online interactions, rather than in-person encounters, can reinforce ageist stereotypes. Conversely, research from our labs shows physical synchrony and supportive, attachment-secure relationships enhance cognitive and sensory abilities, possibly mitigating ageism’s detrimental effects. We advocate fostering in-person, cross-generational interactions as crucial interventions against ageism, improving well-being across the lifespan.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678251344416
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communication Breakdown—Response to “The Social Separation of Old and Young: A Root of Ageism”

Mario Mikulincer, Boaz M. Ben‐David
3 citations
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
Aging and Gerontology Research
10.80
article

Communication Breakdown—Response to “The Social Separation of Old and Young: A Root of Ageism”

Mario Mikulincer, Boaz M. Ben‐David
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper responds to Hagestad and Uhlenberg’s seminal work, which illustrates how ageism and spatial segregation of older adults form a vicious cycle. We argue that spatial segregation exacerbates ageism and cognitive decline by causing intergenerational communication breakdowns, generated by senescent sensory decline, stereotype threats, and digital communication barriers. Thus, online interactions, rather than in-person encounters, can reinforce ageist stereotypes. Conversely, research from our labs shows physical synchrony and supportive, attachment-secure relationships enhance cognitive and sensory abilities, possibly mitigating ageism’s detrimental effects. We advocate fostering in-person, cross-generational interactions as crucial interventions against ageism, improving well-being across the lifespan.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology
Reichman University (IL), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Aging and Gerontology Research
10.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.