Trends and Disparities in the Use of Opioid, Gabapentinoid, and Nonpharmacologic Pain Therapies Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Acute Low Back Pain, 2016–2019

Contemporary practice guidelines recommend nonpharmacologic therapies instead of prescription opioids as first-line treatment for many pain types, including acute low back pain (aLBP). This serial cross-sectional study describes trends in the annual prevalence of physical therapy (PT), chiropractic care, gabapentinoids, and prescription opioid receipt among Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with aLBP from 2016 to 2019, overall and within key demographic, clinical, and geographic subgroups. Overall, changes in PT (5.5%-6.7%), chiropractic care (11.0%-11.7%), and gabapentinoid (9.6%-8.9%) receipt were limited, whereas prescription opioid use substantially decreased (26.2%-17.8%). Prescription opioid receipt was higher among individuals under age 65, American Indian/Alaskan Native, non-Hispanic Black/African American, and Hispanic individuals, individuals with opioid use disorder, and in Southern states, while the use of nonpharmacologic pain therapies remained low among these subgroups. It is essential to promote equitable access to multimodal and guideline-recommended approaches for aLBP management including nonpharmacologic therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Care Research and Review
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587251339917
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends and Disparities in the Use of Opioid, Gabapentinoid, and Nonpharmacologic Pain Therapies Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Acute Low Back Pain, 2016–2019

Patience Moyo, Amal N. Trivedi, Theresa I. Shireman, Jessica S. Merlin et al.
1 citations
Medical Care Research and Review
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
article

Trends and Disparities in the Use of Opioid, Gabapentinoid, and Nonpharmacologic Pain Therapies Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Acute Low Back Pain, 2016–2019

Patience Moyo, Amal N. Trivedi, Theresa I. Shireman, Jessica S. Merlin, Jane Vaillant, Richa Gairola
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Contemporary practice guidelines recommend nonpharmacologic therapies instead of prescription opioids as first-line treatment for many pain types, including acute low back pain (aLBP). This serial cross-sectional study describes trends in the annual prevalence of physical therapy (PT), chiropractic care, gabapentinoids, and prescription opioid receipt among Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with aLBP from 2016 to 2019, overall and within key demographic, clinical, and geographic subgroups. Overall, changes in PT (5.5%-6.7%), chiropractic care (11.0%-11.7%), and gabapentinoid (9.6%-8.9%) receipt were limited, whereas prescription opioid use substantially decreased (26.2%-17.8%). Prescription opioid receipt was higher among individuals under age 65, American Indian/Alaskan Native, non-Hispanic Black/African American, and Hispanic individuals, individuals with opioid use disorder, and in Southern states, while the use of nonpharmacologic pain therapies remained low among these subgroups. It is essential to promote equitable access to multimodal and guideline-recommended approaches for aLBP management including nonpharmacologic therapies.

Medical Care Research and ReviewVol. 82(5)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Brown University (US)
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.