<i>L.G. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa:</i> Is judicial independence still a ‘delicate issue’ in the EU law? Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2023, <i>L.G. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa</i> (C-718/21), EU:C:2023:1015

In L.G. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa the Court of Justice ruled that the new Chamber of the Supreme Court in Poland cannot be considered as an independent ‘court’ under Article 267 TFEU. It is an important milestone in the Court’s case law on the rule of law crisis, since for the first time the ‘presumption of independence’ established under the Getin Noble Bank ruling was rebutted. The Court applied relevant international and domestic case law and connected the interpretation of Article 6 of the Convention with its reading of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The Court’s ruling might also turn out to be a major factor in introducing legislative amendments regarding the independence of the highest domestic court.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x251341688
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

L.G. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa: Is judicial independence still a ‘delicate issue’ in the EU law? Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2023, L.G. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-718/21), EU:C:2023:1015

Barbara Grabowska-Moroz
1 citations
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
European and International Law Studies
8.52
article

L.G. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa: Is judicial independence still a ‘delicate issue’ in the EU law? Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2023, L.G. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-718/21), EU:C:2023:1015

Barbara Grabowska-Moroz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In L.G. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa the Court of Justice ruled that the new Chamber of the Supreme Court in Poland cannot be considered as an independent ‘court’ under Article 267 TFEU. It is an important milestone in the Court’s case law on the rule of law crisis, since for the first time the ‘presumption of independence’ established under the Getin Noble Bank ruling was rebutted. The Court applied relevant international and domestic case law and connected the interpretation of Article 6 of the Convention with its reading of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The Court’s ruling might also turn out to be a major factor in introducing legislative amendments regarding the independence of the highest domestic court.

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative LawVol. 32(3)
Stiftung Mercator
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
European and International Law Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.