Lessons from the Field: Practical Frameworks for CTF Competition Success

Capture the Flag (CTF) competitions have become increasingly popular over the previous decade. This research aims to systematically approach organizing CTF competitions by developing two frameworks. The first framework utilizes design science research with a stakeholder approach to generate a definition of success. By defining success, an actionable set of design principles was derived to guide competition organizers. These design principles are structured to provide actionable insight to organizers to help solve the multi-objective problem of stakeholder requirements. The second framework identifies the challenge development life cycle through a temporal approach while describing the current best practices in challenge development. These models were then evaluated through a CTF competition case study hosted for an intra-collegiate audience. This competition utilized both frameworks to assess them in a critical light. To our knowledge, this paper is the first to provide a design science approach for hosting a successful CTF. Based on the findings, a brief discussion on refining the frameworks and potential areas for improvement is provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/syscon64521.2025.11014836
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Business Strategy and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lessons from the Field: Practical Frameworks for CTF Competition Success

Arthur Carvalho, Suman Bhunia, Dylan Middendorf
1 citations
Business Strategy and Innovation
2.23
article

Lessons from the Field: Practical Frameworks for CTF Competition Success

Arthur Carvalho, Suman Bhunia, Dylan Middendorf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Capture the Flag (CTF) competitions have become increasingly popular over the previous decade. This research aims to systematically approach organizing CTF competitions by developing two frameworks. The first framework utilizes design science research with a stakeholder approach to generate a definition of success. By defining success, an actionable set of design principles was derived to guide competition organizers. These design principles are structured to provide actionable insight to organizers to help solve the multi-objective problem of stakeholder requirements. The second framework identifies the challenge development life cycle through a temporal approach while describing the current best practices in challenge development. These models were then evaluated through a CTF competition case study hosted for an intra-collegiate audience. This competition utilized both frameworks to assess them in a critical light. To our knowledge, this paper is the first to provide a design science approach for hosting a successful CTF. Based on the findings, a brief discussion on refining the frameworks and potential areas for improvement is provided.

Miami University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Business Strategy and Innovation
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lessons from the Field: Practical Frameworks for CTF Competition Success — Arthur Carvalho, Suman Bhunia, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS