Systematic Mapping of Systems Thinking Skills, MBSE Practices, and MOSA Tenets

An analysis of available government reporting indicates that the Department of Defense (DoD) has employed a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) as a business and technical strategy for over 20 years. Recent legislation directed the incorporation of MOSA into all Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs). The legal requirement for MOSA comes at a time when the DoD seeks innovative technologies to maintain its warfighting advantage while encouraging competition and flexibility among defense and intelligence community partners. Successful adoption of an open and modular approach facilitates the rapid deployment, integration, and upgradeability of defense capabilities by relying on widely accepted and supported open standards to help minimize the chances of technology obsolescence in the field, increase innovation and competition, and maximize resource savings. To realize the tenets of MOSA in defense acquisition programs, both from a strategic and technical perspective, it is imperative that the DoD continue to evolve and leverage its use of next-generation Systems Engineering (SE) practices and tools. This paper introduces relevant and emerging SE topics, focusing on systems thinking methodologies and ModelBased Systems Engineering (MBSE) standards as critical enablers for implementing a MOSA-compliant program. Using a systemic approach, this paper identifies an interrelationship between systems thinking, MBSE, and MOSA, outlines the benefits of open standards, and reflects on how the government can capitalize on the advantages of openness while continuing to keep abreast of significant SE advances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/syscon64521.2025.11014857
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Mapping of Systems Thinking Skills, MBSE Practices, and MOSA Tenets

Melanie Brandy Cox, Tim Eveleigh
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

Systematic Mapping of Systems Thinking Skills, MBSE Practices, and MOSA Tenets

Melanie Brandy Cox, Tim Eveleigh
article en

Abstract

An analysis of available government reporting indicates that the Department of Defense (DoD) has employed a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) as a business and technical strategy for over 20 years. Recent legislation directed the incorporation of MOSA into all Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs). The legal requirement for MOSA comes at a time when the DoD seeks innovative technologies to maintain its warfighting advantage while encouraging competition and flexibility among defense and intelligence community partners. Successful adoption of an open and modular approach facilitates the rapid deployment, integration, and upgradeability of defense capabilities by relying on widely accepted and supported open standards to help minimize the chances of technology obsolescence in the field, increase innovation and competition, and maximize resource savings. To realize the tenets of MOSA in defense acquisition programs, both from a strategic and technical perspective, it is imperative that the DoD continue to evolve and leverage its use of next-generation Systems Engineering (SE) practices and tools. This paper introduces relevant and emerging SE topics, focusing on systems thinking methodologies and ModelBased Systems Engineering (MBSE) standards as critical enablers for implementing a MOSA-compliant program. Using a systemic approach, this paper identifies an interrelationship between systems thinking, MBSE, and MOSA, outlines the benefits of open standards, and reflects on how the government can capitalize on the advantages of openness while continuing to keep abreast of significant SE advances.

George Washington University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.