Structured Requirements for DomainKey Identified Mail (DKIM) Standard Verification

The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) publishes Request for Comment (RFC) artifacts to standardize internet protocols, technologies, and architectures. Often the RFC requirements may not align to well-defined requirement standards promoted in systems engineering. This paper demonstrates how existing RFC documentation for DomainKey Identified Mail (DKIM) is improved by implementing structured requirements. Using ISO 29418 as a reference for writing good requirements, this paper demonstrates how existing RFC requirements could be transposed to well-defined requirements. A structured approach removes ambiguity making the RFC more precise. The results of this approach show the syntaxial structure of a requirement. Structured requirements provide an immediate benefit to an RFC by adding clarity and generating artifacts for use in systems engineering (SE) methodologies and requirement management (RM) systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/syscon64521.2025.11014840
Primary Topic
Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structured Requirements for DomainKey Identified Mail (DKIM) Standard Verification

Jeremy S. Daily, Sarah Rudder, Brian Mooney
Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
article

Structured Requirements for DomainKey Identified Mail (DKIM) Standard Verification

Jeremy S. Daily, Sarah Rudder, Brian Mooney
article en

Abstract

The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) publishes Request for Comment (RFC) artifacts to standardize internet protocols, technologies, and architectures. Often the RFC requirements may not align to well-defined requirement standards promoted in systems engineering. This paper demonstrates how existing RFC documentation for DomainKey Identified Mail (DKIM) is improved by implementing structured requirements. Using ISO 29418 as a reference for writing good requirements, this paper demonstrates how existing RFC requirements could be transposed to well-defined requirements. A structured approach removes ambiguity making the RFC more precise. The results of this approach show the syntaxial structure of a requirement. Structured requirements provide an immediate benefit to an RFC by adding clarity and generating artifacts for use in systems engineering (SE) methodologies and requirement management (RM) systems.

Colorado State University System (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Structured Requirements for DomainKey Identified Mail (DKIM) Standard Verification — Jeremy S. Daily, Sarah Rudder, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS