Modeling Digital Threads as Executable Workflows Using SysMLv2

Model-Based Systems Engineering leverages inter-connected models to improve Systems Engineering practice. Enabling technologies for MBSE often leave the details of engineering processes implicit. Digital threads are being codified to link authoritative sources of information across a digital modeling environment. When considered as workflows, digital threads make explicit the details of MBSE processes. As systems in their own right, digital threads could benefit from the same processes and analyses used in MBSE. In this paper, we refine (1) the notion of digital threads as workflows and (2) the environment necessary to execute them. Digital threads are built by composing atomic capabilities that perform specific authoring, verification, analysis, and reporting operations and represent the automatable part of the digital engineering workflow. We derive requirements for modeling digital threads describing engineering process workflows built via composition of atomic capabilities, as well as for modeling the execution environment. We illustrate how to model digital threads and atomic capabilities using SysMLv2 action definitions. Finally we describe our interpreter for executing Sys<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$M$</tex> Lv2-based digital threads for AADL models. Combined, these contributions (1) allow systems engineer to build digital threads within their modeling environment, reducing the barrier towards defining tailored digital threads, and (2) move towards enabling modeling the process of modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/syscon64521.2025.11014815
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Digital Threads as Executable Workflows Using SysMLv2

Jérôme Hugues, Aaron Greenhouse, Joseph R. Seibel
Scientific Computing and Data Management
article

Modeling Digital Threads as Executable Workflows Using SysMLv2

Jérôme Hugues, Aaron Greenhouse, Joseph R. Seibel
article en

Abstract

Model-Based Systems Engineering leverages inter-connected models to improve Systems Engineering practice. Enabling technologies for MBSE often leave the details of engineering processes implicit. Digital threads are being codified to link authoritative sources of information across a digital modeling environment. When considered as workflows, digital threads make explicit the details of MBSE processes. As systems in their own right, digital threads could benefit from the same processes and analyses used in MBSE. In this paper, we refine (1) the notion of digital threads as workflows and (2) the environment necessary to execute them. Digital threads are built by composing atomic capabilities that perform specific authoring, verification, analysis, and reporting operations and represent the automatable part of the digital engineering workflow. We derive requirements for modeling digital threads describing engineering process workflows built via composition of atomic capabilities, as well as for modeling the execution environment. We illustrate how to model digital threads and atomic capabilities using SysMLv2 action definitions. Finally we describe our interpreter for executing Sys<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$M$</tex> Lv2-based digital threads for AADL models. Combined, these contributions (1) allow systems engineer to build digital threads within their modeling environment, reducing the barrier towards defining tailored digital threads, and (2) move towards enabling modeling the process of modeling.

Software Engineering Institute (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.