Decoding predicted future states from the brain’s “physics engine”

Successful engagement with the physical world requires the ability to predict future events and plan interventions to alter that future. Growing evidence implicates a set of regions in the human parietal and frontal lobes [also known as the "physics network" (PN)] in such intuitive physical inferences. However, the central tenet of this hypothesis, that PN runs forward simulations to predict future states, remains untested. In this preregistered study, we first show that PN abstractly represents whether two objects are in contact with each other, a physical scene property critical for prediction (because objects' fates are intertwined when they are in contact). We then show that PN (but not other visual areas) carries abstract information about predicted future contact events (i.e., collisions). These findings support the hypothesis that PN contains a generative model of the physical world that conducts forward simulations, serving as the brain's "physics engine."

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Advances
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adr7429
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding predicted future states from the brain’s “physics engine”

Nancy Kanwisher, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Elizabeth Mieczkowski, R. T. Pramod et al.
6 citations
Science Advances
Face Recognition and Perception
8.59
article

Decoding predicted future states from the brain’s “physics engine”

Nancy Kanwisher, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Elizabeth Mieczkowski, R. T. Pramod, Cyn Fang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Successful engagement with the physical world requires the ability to predict future events and plan interventions to alter that future. Growing evidence implicates a set of regions in the human parietal and frontal lobes [also known as the "physics network" (PN)] in such intuitive physical inferences. However, the central tenet of this hypothesis, that PN runs forward simulations to predict future states, remains untested. In this preregistered study, we first show that PN abstractly represents whether two objects are in contact with each other, a physical scene property critical for prediction (because objects' fates are intertwined when they are in contact). We then show that PN (but not other visual areas) carries abstract information about predicted future contact events (i.e., collisions). These findings support the hypothesis that PN contains a generative model of the physical world that conducts forward simulations, serving as the brain's "physics engine."

Science AdvancesVol. 11(22)
Princeton University (US), Intelligent Machines (Sweden) (SE), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Face Recognition and Perception
8.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.