Comparative analysis of projector‐based compression and quantum autoencoders

Quantum compression is a cornerstone of quantum information science, promising efficient encoding of large quantum states into fewer qubits while retaining high fidelity. In this work, we compare two pivotal strategies for compressing an i.i.d. quantum source under small-scale (few-qubit) regimes. The first strategy relies on a projector-based compression method that discards low-probability components in the state’s spectral decomposition, achieving near-optimal asymptotic compression in principle. The second strategy employs a quantum autoencoder (QAE), a variational circuit that learns to embed essential information into fewer qubits. We implement both approaches in simulation, gauge their performance, and explore how many qubits can be ”saved” in practice. Our results highlight how projector-based compression provides a near-optimal yet analytically prescriptive solution, whereas autoencoders offer a machine-learning–style route that can adapt to varied input states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3062823
Primary Topic
Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of projector‐based compression and quantum autoencoders

R. Chakrabarti, Alexei Kaltchenko, Wrenen D'Cunha
Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks
article

Comparative analysis of projector‐based compression and quantum autoencoders

R. Chakrabarti, Alexei Kaltchenko, Wrenen D'Cunha
article en

Abstract

Quantum compression is a cornerstone of quantum information science, promising efficient encoding of large quantum states into fewer qubits while retaining high fidelity. In this work, we compare two pivotal strategies for compressing an i.i.d. quantum source under small-scale (few-qubit) regimes. The first strategy relies on a projector-based compression method that discards low-probability components in the state’s spectral decomposition, achieving near-optimal asymptotic compression in principle. The second strategy employs a quantum autoencoder (QAE), a variational circuit that learns to embed essential information into fewer qubits. We implement both approaches in simulation, gauge their performance, and explore how many qubits can be ”saved” in practice. Our results highlight how projector-based compression provides a near-optimal yet analytically prescriptive solution, whereas autoencoders offer a machine-learning–style route that can adapt to varied input states.

Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.