Science and Religion: New Avenues Beyond the Fixed Categories

Building on recent work by historians of science, many scholars studying the relationships between religion, theology, and science have stopped treating the concepts of science and religion as if they were natural kinds. But if we refrain from using these terms in an essentialist way, what comes next? Should both categories be abandoned, or perhaps replaced by other ones? This article argues that (1) in some cases the use of science and religion as generalizing concepts remains both unavoidable and responsible, (2) in other cases we need more specificity and acknowledgement of their contextuality, and (3) in general we need more attentiveness to newly emerging configurations of the ever-changing relationships between science(s) and religion(s). In particular, it is suggested that in the near future we may see science and religion coming together in an unprecedented way, namely as allies in a shared struggle against post-truth thinking, institution-skepticism, and societal marginalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toronto Journal of Theology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/tjt-2024-0069
Primary Topic
Evolution and Science Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science and Religion: New Avenues Beyond the Fixed Categories

G. van den Brink
1 links
Toronto Journal of Theology
Evolution and Science Education
article

Science and Religion: New Avenues Beyond the Fixed Categories

G. van den Brink
article en

Abstract

Building on recent work by historians of science, many scholars studying the relationships between religion, theology, and science have stopped treating the concepts of science and religion as if they were natural kinds. But if we refrain from using these terms in an essentialist way, what comes next? Should both categories be abandoned, or perhaps replaced by other ones? This article argues that (1) in some cases the use of science and religion as generalizing concepts remains both unavoidable and responsible, (2) in other cases we need more specificity and acknowledgement of their contextuality, and (3) in general we need more attentiveness to newly emerging configurations of the ever-changing relationships between science(s) and religion(s). In particular, it is suggested that in the near future we may see science and religion coming together in an unprecedented way, namely as allies in a shared struggle against post-truth thinking, institution-skepticism, and societal marginalization.

Toronto Journal of TheologyVol. 41(1)
North-West University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Evolution and Science Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Science and Religion: New Avenues Beyond the Fixed Categories — G. van den Brink · Toronto Journal of Theology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS