European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Standard Operating Procedure for the development of guidelines

The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) has developed a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the development of clinical practice guidelines, ensuring adherence to rigorous methodological standards based on the principles of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Key components include a transparent process for managing conflicts of interest, the incorporation of multidisciplinary panels including individuals with lived experience of diabetes, an evidence synthesis based on comprehensive systematic reviews, and an explicit peer review process. This SOP delineates the roles and responsibilities of the main structures involved, including the Guidelines Oversight Committee, Guideline Development Panels, and Evidence Synthesis Teams. Additionally, the SOP describes the main stages in guideline development, namely scoping of the guideline topic, evidence synthesis, development of Evidence-to-Decision frameworks for the formulation of clear, patient-centred recommendations, writing of the guideline document and the review process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetologia
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06370-1
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Standard Operating Procedure for the development of guidelines

Dı́dac Mauricio, Απόστολος Τσάπας, Richard I. G. Holt, Stefano Del Prato et al.
9 citations
Diabetologia
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
16.91
article

European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Standard Operating Procedure for the development of guidelines

Dı́dac Mauricio, Απόστολος Τσάπας, Richard I. G. Holt, Stefano Del Prato, Valentina Lorenzoni, Seán F. Dinneen, Chantal Mathieu, Andrew Advani, Tsvetalina I. Tankova, Oliver Kuß, Francesco Zaccardi, Thomas Karagiannis, Melanie Jane Davies
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) has developed a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the development of clinical practice guidelines, ensuring adherence to rigorous methodological standards based on the principles of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Key components include a transparent process for managing conflicts of interest, the incorporation of multidisciplinary panels including individuals with lived experience of diabetes, an evidence synthesis based on comprehensive systematic reviews, and an explicit peer review process. This SOP delineates the roles and responsibilities of the main structures involved, including the Guidelines Oversight Committee, Guideline Development Panels, and Evidence Synthesis Teams. Additionally, the SOP describes the main stages in guideline development, namely scoping of the guideline topic, evidence synthesis, development of Evidence-to-Decision frameworks for the formulation of clear, patient-centred recommendations, writing of the guideline document and the review process.

DiabetologiaVol. 68(8)
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), University of Leicester (GB), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), University Hospital Galway (IE), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Medical University of Sofia (BG), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (ES), Advanced Computer System (Italy) (IT), Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE), NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Southampton (GB), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), KU Leuven (BE)
McMaster University, Università degli Studi di Firenze
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
16.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.