Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Use of Social Media in Economics

Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Use of Social Media in EconomicsThis committee was formed in May 2024 by the president of the AEA, Janet Currie.Our charge was twofold.First, assess and document the opportunities offered by different social media platforms to our profession as well as the problems arising therefrom.Second, prepare a set of recommended best practices for economists, the AEA and other associations, and departments and other employers of economists.The literature has shown social media to have both potentially positive and negative effects for academics.Positive effects include facilitating professional network formation, increasing citations and awareness of research work, and opportunities for minoritized individuals to find community. 1 These benefits can vary depending on group identity; for example, in the context of academic networking through social media, a positive gender gap is identified for women as well as a racial gap favoring white men. 2 Negative effects include exposure to abuse and harassment, which may target some groups more than others 3 and is exacerbated under anonymity. 4 These findings are against the background of broad general studies of social media impacts, though this report is primarily concerned with professional use. 5 To understand how these varied effects arise in economics social media use, and to form strategies to capture benefits while reducing harms, we surveyed the AEA membership, interviewed several economists with relevant experiences, and corresponded with others. 6 Those efforts reveal several facts that form the basis for our policy recommendations.These are explained in more detail below and summarized here. There is a valuable role for social media to play in scholarly communication in economics. Positive impacts arise through connection of scholarship and scholars: Learning about new work and having one's work learned about. Finding new collaborators and even positions. Discussing methods, research, and current economic events. Particularly positive for people who may be considered "outsiders." #EconTwitter was once a center of positive interaction but has declined. There are also negative effects of social media use in economics: These often fall outside the control of individuals impacted and can be severe. They often take the form of abuse, harassment, rumormongering, or other harmful forms of interaction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AEA Papers and Proceedings
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.115.820
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Use of Social Media in Economics

Tim Bresnahan
AEA Papers and Proceedings
Media Influence and Politics
article

Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Use of Social Media in Economics

Tim Bresnahan
article en

Abstract

Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Use of Social Media in EconomicsThis committee was formed in May 2024 by the president of the AEA, Janet Currie.Our charge was twofold.First, assess and document the opportunities offered by different social media platforms to our profession as well as the problems arising therefrom.Second, prepare a set of recommended best practices for economists, the AEA and other associations, and departments and other employers of economists.The literature has shown social media to have both potentially positive and negative effects for academics.Positive effects include facilitating professional network formation, increasing citations and awareness of research work, and opportunities for minoritized individuals to find community. 1 These benefits can vary depending on group identity; for example, in the context of academic networking through social media, a positive gender gap is identified for women as well as a racial gap favoring white men. 2 Negative effects include exposure to abuse and harassment, which may target some groups more than others 3 and is exacerbated under anonymity. 4 These findings are against the background of broad general studies of social media impacts, though this report is primarily concerned with professional use. 5 To understand how these varied effects arise in economics social media use, and to form strategies to capture benefits while reducing harms, we surveyed the AEA membership, interviewed several economists with relevant experiences, and corresponded with others. 6 Those efforts reveal several facts that form the basis for our policy recommendations.These are explained in more detail below and summarized here. There is a valuable role for social media to play in scholarly communication in economics. Positive impacts arise through connection of scholarship and scholars: Learning about new work and having one's work learned about. Finding new collaborators and even positions. Discussing methods, research, and current economic events. Particularly positive for people who may be considered "outsiders." #EconTwitter was once a center of positive interaction but has declined. There are also negative effects of social media use in economics: These often fall outside the control of individuals impacted and can be severe. They often take the form of abuse, harassment, rumormongering, or other harmful forms of interaction.

AEA Papers and ProceedingsVol. 115
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Media Influence and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Use of Social Media in Economics — Tim Bresnahan · AEA Papers and Proceedings (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS