The Effectiveness of Local Conservation Ballots
Global action to slow biodiversity loss is critically needed but comes at substantial cost. In this article, we assess the effectiveness of local ballot measures for land-based conservation projects in the United States as a way to increase bird abundance, a key conservation indicator. Using a citizen science dataset of bird observations, we employ an abundance model to estimate relative abundance conditional on observer effort and exploit a sharp discontinuity in land-based conservation funding at the vote threshold to estimate plausibly causal effects. We find that an approved ballot measure has modest but significant impacts that accrue over ten years.
Authors
- Eyal Frank (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5876-5319)
- Joséphine Gantois (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8542-1263)
- Dylan Hogan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2534-9107)
- Anouch Missirian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7142-1839)
Institutions
- Center for Economic and Policy Research (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- Toulouse School of Economics (FR)
- Columbia University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- AEA Papers and Proceedings
- Published
- 2025-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20251073
- Primary Topic
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00