Does Gender Tagging Public Works Increase Women's Participation? Experimental Evidence from Haiti, Kenya, and Rwanda

Public works programs often fail to induce participation by women in dual-headed households, with implications for closing gender gaps in autonomy. We randomize “gender tagging,” labeling as “for women” in cash-for-work programs targeting poor households in Haiti, Kenya, and Rwanda. Gender tagging increases women's participation by 11 to 27 percentage points (29-192 percent) in contexts where women have low labor market attachment. We apply recent econometric methods to test heterogeneity across households to show that gender tagging generates catch-up: The women least likely to participate under the status quo program experience the largest increase in participation from gender tagging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AEA Papers and Proceedings
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20251023
Primary Topic
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Gender Tagging Public Works Increase Women's Participation? Experimental Evidence from Haiti, Kenya, and Rwanda

John D. Loeser, Felipe Alexander Dunsch, Florence Kondylis, Lelys Dinarte-Diaz et al.
1 links
AEA Papers and Proceedings
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
article

Does Gender Tagging Public Works Increase Women's Participation? Experimental Evidence from Haiti, Kenya, and Rwanda

John D. Loeser, Felipe Alexander Dunsch, Florence Kondylis, Lelys Dinarte-Diaz, Dahyeon Jeong, Erin Kelley, Jonas Heirman, Gregory Lane, Christian Paúl, Tanay Balantrapu
article en

Abstract

Public works programs often fail to induce participation by women in dual-headed households, with implications for closing gender gaps in autonomy. We randomize “gender tagging,” labeling as “for women” in cash-for-work programs targeting poor households in Haiti, Kenya, and Rwanda. Gender tagging increases women's participation by 11 to 27 percentage points (29-192 percent) in contexts where women have low labor market attachment. We apply recent econometric methods to test heterogeneity across households to show that gender tagging generates catch-up: The women least likely to participate under the status quo program experience the largest increase in participation from gender tagging.

AEA Papers and ProceedingsVol. 115
World Food Programme (IT), World Bank (US), University of Chicago (US), Impact (CA), Impact Technology Development (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.