Monitoring and restricting real property ownership on national security grounds: The case of Northern European countries

Rapid changes in global geopolitics have prompted debate about the need to monitor and restrict ownership of real property on national security grounds. Research of foreign ownership on real property has focused on the economic effects of infrastructure purchases, whereas the range of land administration tools to monitor or restrict ownership rights has not received much detailed examination. The aim of this research is to map and compare the current regulatory landscape for monitoring and restricting real estate ownership in the Northern European context. We root our study into land administration literature and particularly to the Legal Cadastral Domain Model that separates the subject and object of the restriction. We collect data from five case countries, namely Estonia, Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and Norway, through email interviews and analyse the repertory of tools currently in place. The results show that various land administration tools are used for monitoring and restricting ownership rights, of which most typical example is expropriation. Although the application of monitoring and restricting tools is often justified with other reasons such as protecting agriculture or food production, their use may still support national security means indirectly. Also, while there exist several different tools, most of them are used because of the characteristics of the object of the restriction, not the subject. • National security is cross-cutting theme affecting also LA. • Tools of LA can be used to restrict ownership right. • This study mapped LA tools in Northern European context. • Results may be transferred to countries with facing similar security issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Use Policy
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107630
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urbanization and City Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring and restricting real property ownership on national security grounds: The case of Northern European countries

Kirsikka Riekkinen, Pauliina Krigsholm, Olga Penkkilä
1 citations
Land Use Policy
Urbanization and City Planning
6.18
article

Monitoring and restricting real property ownership on national security grounds: The case of Northern European countries

Kirsikka Riekkinen, Pauliina Krigsholm, Olga Penkkilä
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Rapid changes in global geopolitics have prompted debate about the need to monitor and restrict ownership of real property on national security grounds. Research of foreign ownership on real property has focused on the economic effects of infrastructure purchases, whereas the range of land administration tools to monitor or restrict ownership rights has not received much detailed examination. The aim of this research is to map and compare the current regulatory landscape for monitoring and restricting real estate ownership in the Northern European context. We root our study into land administration literature and particularly to the Legal Cadastral Domain Model that separates the subject and object of the restriction. We collect data from five case countries, namely Estonia, Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and Norway, through email interviews and analyse the repertory of tools currently in place. The results show that various land administration tools are used for monitoring and restricting ownership rights, of which most typical example is expropriation. Although the application of monitoring and restricting tools is often justified with other reasons such as protecting agriculture or food production, their use may still support national security means indirectly. Also, while there exist several different tools, most of them are used because of the characteristics of the object of the restriction, not the subject. • National security is cross-cutting theme affecting also LA. • Tools of LA can be used to restrict ownership right. • This study mapped LA tools in Northern European context. • Results may be transferred to countries with facing similar security issues.

Land Use PolicyVol. 157
Geological Survey of Finland (FI), Maanmittauslaitos, Aalto University (FI)
Aalto-Yliopisto
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urbanization and City Planning
6.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.