Evaluation of engineering properties of soil for sustainable urban development

Abstract Rapid urbanization in southern Saudi Arabia necessitates accurate geotechnical assessments to support sustainable development. However, the region lacks comprehensive seismic-based soil classification studies, raising concerns regarding construction safety. This study utilizes seismic refraction and tomography techniques to characterize soil properties and evaluate their appropriateness for infrastructure development. Ten seismic refraction and tomography surveys and two multichannel analysis of surface wave profiles were conducted to classify soil conditions based on seismic velocities and geotechnical parameters. The results reveal three distinct subsurface layers: (1) alluvial soil ( V p = 300–940 m/s), (2) fractured basement ( V p = 1,350–1,890 m/s), and (3) massive basement ( V p > 2,400 m/s). According to National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program criteria, soil classification identifies loose sediments (Class E) as unsuitable for construction, while stiffer deposits (Classes D and C) offer stable foundations. Integrating seismic techniques presents a cost-effective alternative to traditional drilling, providing a rapid assessment tool for urban planners. These findings aid in optimizing construction site selection, thereby minimizing risks associated with weak soil zones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Geosciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2025-0799
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of engineering properties of soil for sustainable urban development

Saleh Qaysi, Awad Al-Shmrani, Kamal S. Abdelrahman
Open Geosciences
Landslides and related hazards
article

Evaluation of engineering properties of soil for sustainable urban development

Saleh Qaysi, Awad Al-Shmrani, Kamal S. Abdelrahman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rapid urbanization in southern Saudi Arabia necessitates accurate geotechnical assessments to support sustainable development. However, the region lacks comprehensive seismic-based soil classification studies, raising concerns regarding construction safety. This study utilizes seismic refraction and tomography techniques to characterize soil properties and evaluate their appropriateness for infrastructure development. Ten seismic refraction and tomography surveys and two multichannel analysis of surface wave profiles were conducted to classify soil conditions based on seismic velocities and geotechnical parameters. The results reveal three distinct subsurface layers: (1) alluvial soil ( V p = 300–940 m/s), (2) fractured basement ( V p = 1,350–1,890 m/s), and (3) massive basement ( V p > 2,400 m/s). According to National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program criteria, soil classification identifies loose sediments (Class E) as unsuitable for construction, while stiffer deposits (Classes D and C) offer stable foundations. Integrating seismic techniques presents a cost-effective alternative to traditional drilling, providing a rapid assessment tool for urban planners. These findings aid in optimizing construction site selection, thereby minimizing risks associated with weak soil zones.

Open GeosciencesVol. 17(1)
King Saud University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of engineering properties of soil for sustainable urban development — Saleh Qaysi, Awad Al-Shmrani, et al. · Open Geosciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS