Cocoa driven deforestation in Cameroon: Practices and policy

Cocoa production has increased in Cameroon since the 2000s, supported by policies to enhance productivity, yields, farmer incomes and state revenues. Other policies incentivize zero-deforestation production and forest protection. However cocoa farming practices cause deforestation and degradation. Scientific evidence of practice-policy interactions is lacking. Given this context we identified perceptions, farming practices and their on-ground impacts, policies and initiatives addressing deforestation and cocoa. A practice-based conceptual approach guided 67 interviews, 8 focus group discussions and remote sensing analysis of land cover and ground validation in 557 locations around Ntui. Increasing, small-scale cocoa-driven deforestation, totalling 4599 ha over the past decade was found. Maps show 64 % of observed cocoa farms as forest. Farmers do not perceive themselves as responsible, attributing deforestation to poverty, low yields, land unavailability, migration, population growth, and high land and labour prices. Apart from sustainability certification, farmers were unaware of zero-deforestation initiatives and policies. Policies appear ineffective in halting cocoa-related deforestation or increasing yields, but modestly effective in expanding production. Opportunities to reduce deforestation include yield improvement, information, law enforcement, and land planning. However productivity increases could drive further deforestation. Paradoxically, farmers perceive no trade-offs between livelihoods and forest use, contrary to other value-chain stakeholders. These results lead to recommendations for coherent forest and agricultural policies, pragmatic forest and agroforestry definitions, accurate (agro)forest mapping, and evidence-based reframing of discourses on cocoa, agriculture and forests. Incongruent perceptions, practices and policies challenge implementation of the EU Deforestation Regulation. • Data analysis indicates increasing cocoa-driven deforestation in Cameroon. • Policies on deforestation and cocoa yields increases are ineffective, supporting expansion. • Ground validation shows the unreliability of maps showing forest and grasslands. • Cocoa farmers do not perceive their practices to constitute deforestation. • Incongruent perceptions, practices and policies challenge EUDR implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Policy and Economics
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103533
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cocoa driven deforestation in Cameroon: Practices and policy

Valerie Janssen, Verina Ingram, Arun Kumar Pratihast, Victorine Akenji Neh
4 citations
Forest Policy and Economics
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
10.98
article

Cocoa driven deforestation in Cameroon: Practices and policy

Valerie Janssen, Verina Ingram, Arun Kumar Pratihast, Victorine Akenji Neh
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Cocoa production has increased in Cameroon since the 2000s, supported by policies to enhance productivity, yields, farmer incomes and state revenues. Other policies incentivize zero-deforestation production and forest protection. However cocoa farming practices cause deforestation and degradation. Scientific evidence of practice-policy interactions is lacking. Given this context we identified perceptions, farming practices and their on-ground impacts, policies and initiatives addressing deforestation and cocoa. A practice-based conceptual approach guided 67 interviews, 8 focus group discussions and remote sensing analysis of land cover and ground validation in 557 locations around Ntui. Increasing, small-scale cocoa-driven deforestation, totalling 4599 ha over the past decade was found. Maps show 64 % of observed cocoa farms as forest. Farmers do not perceive themselves as responsible, attributing deforestation to poverty, low yields, land unavailability, migration, population growth, and high land and labour prices. Apart from sustainability certification, farmers were unaware of zero-deforestation initiatives and policies. Policies appear ineffective in halting cocoa-related deforestation or increasing yields, but modestly effective in expanding production. Opportunities to reduce deforestation include yield improvement, information, law enforcement, and land planning. However productivity increases could drive further deforestation. Paradoxically, farmers perceive no trade-offs between livelihoods and forest use, contrary to other value-chain stakeholders. These results lead to recommendations for coherent forest and agricultural policies, pragmatic forest and agroforestry definitions, accurate (agro)forest mapping, and evidence-based reframing of discourses on cocoa, agriculture and forests. Incongruent perceptions, practices and policies challenge implementation of the EU Deforestation Regulation. • Data analysis indicates increasing cocoa-driven deforestation in Cameroon. • Policies on deforestation and cocoa yields increases are ineffective, supporting expansion. • Ground validation shows the unreliability of maps showing forest and grasslands. • Cocoa farmers do not perceive their practices to constitute deforestation. • Incongruent perceptions, practices and policies challenge EUDR implementation.

Forest Policy and EconomicsVol. 177
University of Buea (CM), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
10.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.