Evaluation of single chamber electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formate for application under biocompatible conditions

The electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (eCO 2 RR) facilitates high rates and yields for the selective production of formate, a quintessential C1-compound that can serve as a valuable carbon and energy source for biosynthesis. The use of double-chamber (DC) electrochemical cells with membranes is deemed essential to avoid mixing of electrochemical products (i.e. anodic oxygen and cathodic formate) and thus cross-reactions that lower yields, Faradaic efficiency (FE) and effective rate. However, single-chamber (SC) setups for eCO 2 RR can be more suitable to combine with bioprocesses. This work comprehensively evaluates, using different experimental set-ups, the conditions under which SC operation can obtain results comparable to DC systems. At a 50 mL scale, under biocompatible conditions, formate production in the SC setup achieved a 14 % reduction in the production rate (146 mg L −1 h −1 for SC and 170 mg L −1 h −1 for DC) and a 15 % decrease in FE (72.2 % in SC and 84.7 % in DC). The highest formate concentration produced in 24 h SC experiments was 1.8 g·L −1 with FE of 41 %, a concentration appropriate for fermentation processes. The SC operation of eCO 2 RR to formate without a membrane could reduce energy losses and capital costs, although at the cost of an expected reduction in rate and FE. • First-time demonstration of formate production via eCO 2 RR in single chamber setup. • Single chamber benchmarked against double chamber setup. • Single chamber achieved r formate of 0.061 mmol h −1 cm −2 with 72 % of FE. • More negative potentials in single chamber increased current density and r formate . • Sterilization methods reduced FE; chemical sterilization less disruptive than steam

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2025.103136
Citations
4
Primary Topic
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of single chamber electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formate for application under biocompatible conditions

Mira Sulonen, Albert Guisasola, Philip Haus, Falk Harnisch et al.
4 citations
Journal of CO2 Utilization
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
1.45
article

Evaluation of single chamber electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formate for application under biocompatible conditions

Mira Sulonen, Albert Guisasola, Philip Haus, Falk Harnisch, Paniz Izadi, Zainab Ul, Juan Antonio Baeza
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (eCO 2 RR) facilitates high rates and yields for the selective production of formate, a quintessential C1-compound that can serve as a valuable carbon and energy source for biosynthesis. The use of double-chamber (DC) electrochemical cells with membranes is deemed essential to avoid mixing of electrochemical products (i.e. anodic oxygen and cathodic formate) and thus cross-reactions that lower yields, Faradaic efficiency (FE) and effective rate. However, single-chamber (SC) setups for eCO 2 RR can be more suitable to combine with bioprocesses. This work comprehensively evaluates, using different experimental set-ups, the conditions under which SC operation can obtain results comparable to DC systems. At a 50 mL scale, under biocompatible conditions, formate production in the SC setup achieved a 14 % reduction in the production rate (146 mg L −1 h −1 for SC and 170 mg L −1 h −1 for DC) and a 15 % decrease in FE (72.2 % in SC and 84.7 % in DC). The highest formate concentration produced in 24 h SC experiments was 1.8 g·L −1 with FE of 41 %, a concentration appropriate for fermentation processes. The SC operation of eCO 2 RR to formate without a membrane could reduce energy losses and capital costs, although at the cost of an expected reduction in rate and FE. • First-time demonstration of formate production via eCO 2 RR in single chamber setup. • Single chamber benchmarked against double chamber setup. • Single chamber achieved r formate of 0.061 mmol h −1 cm −2 with 72 % of FE. • More negative potentials in single chamber increased current density and r formate . • Sterilization methods reduced FE; chemical sterilization less disruptive than steam

Journal of CO2 UtilizationVol. 97
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
European Commission, Generalitat de Catalunya, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
1.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.