PF-PSS: a double-layer parallel embedded feature selection method for cancer gene expression data

The primary challenge in diagnosing cancer subtypes lies in the high dimensionality and sample imbalance of cancer gene expression data, which complicates accurate diagnosis from such complex datasets. To address the issues of feature selection (FS) and cancer subtype diagnosis for cancer gene expression data, a novel FS method with a double-layer parallel embedded structure has been proposed. This method is structured into two distinct stages: a preliminary screening stage followed by a fine screening stage. In the preliminary screening stage, a "mean-median" method was initially proposed to establish the threshold for the filter FS approach. During the fine screening stage, the Lasso regression algorithm was employed to refine the initial subset, thereby retaining what are referred to as "elite features." Both Sequential Forward Selection (SFS) and Sequential Backward Selection (SBS) algorithms preserved the ranking of these "elite features" along with their original total weight order. The enhanced SFS and SBS algorithms were then utilized to identify features that significantly influenced both the "elite features" and the initial subset. Subsequently, these two sets of features were merged and subjected to another round of screening. Based on the number of merged features, two distinct screening strategies were implemented. Ultimately, this process yielded a final set of selected features. Since the four filter methods were run separately in the preliminary screening stage, it can be regarded as a parallel operation of filter methods. The improved SFS and SBS algorithms were run separately in the fine screening stage, and can be regarded as a parallel operation of wrapper methods. Therefore, the proposed method is named PF-PSS. To demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed PF-PSS FS method, it was evaluated on 20 cancer gene expression datasets. In the vast majority of cases, the proposed method demonstrates excellent performance in terms of classification accuracy and feature quantity selection. In particular, the PF-PSS FS method achieved a classification accuracy of up to 100% for 9 of the datasets, and the proportion of selected features for 12 of the datasets remained within 7%, with the minimum selected feature count even reaching 0.75%. On the other hand, the designed method has shown better performance in other evaluation criteria and running time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Of Big Data
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-025-01144-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PF-PSS: a double-layer parallel embedded feature selection method for cancer gene expression data

Jie‐Sheng Wang, Yucai Wang, Yuliang Qi, Yonghua Song et al.
1 citations
Journal Of Big Data
Gene expression and cancer classification
0.81
article

PF-PSS: a double-layer parallel embedded feature selection method for cancer gene expression data

Jie‐Sheng Wang, Yucai Wang, Yuliang Qi, Yonghua Song, Shihua Li, Hao-Ming Song, Yi‐Peng Shang‐Guan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The primary challenge in diagnosing cancer subtypes lies in the high dimensionality and sample imbalance of cancer gene expression data, which complicates accurate diagnosis from such complex datasets. To address the issues of feature selection (FS) and cancer subtype diagnosis for cancer gene expression data, a novel FS method with a double-layer parallel embedded structure has been proposed. This method is structured into two distinct stages: a preliminary screening stage followed by a fine screening stage. In the preliminary screening stage, a "mean-median" method was initially proposed to establish the threshold for the filter FS approach. During the fine screening stage, the Lasso regression algorithm was employed to refine the initial subset, thereby retaining what are referred to as "elite features." Both Sequential Forward Selection (SFS) and Sequential Backward Selection (SBS) algorithms preserved the ranking of these "elite features" along with their original total weight order. The enhanced SFS and SBS algorithms were then utilized to identify features that significantly influenced both the "elite features" and the initial subset. Subsequently, these two sets of features were merged and subjected to another round of screening. Based on the number of merged features, two distinct screening strategies were implemented. Ultimately, this process yielded a final set of selected features. Since the four filter methods were run separately in the preliminary screening stage, it can be regarded as a parallel operation of filter methods. The improved SFS and SBS algorithms were run separately in the fine screening stage, and can be regarded as a parallel operation of wrapper methods. Therefore, the proposed method is named PF-PSS. To demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed PF-PSS FS method, it was evaluated on 20 cancer gene expression datasets. In the vast majority of cases, the proposed method demonstrates excellent performance in terms of classification accuracy and feature quantity selection. In particular, the PF-PSS FS method achieved a classification accuracy of up to 100% for 9 of the datasets, and the proportion of selected features for 12 of the datasets remained within 7%, with the minimum selected feature count even reaching 0.75%. On the other hand, the designed method has shown better performance in other evaluation criteria and running time.

Journal Of Big DataVol. 12(1)
University of Science and Technology Liaoning (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Gene expression and cancer classification
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.