How does feeding strategy affect the aromatic volatile compounds profile and sensory properties of organic fresh pork?

This study aimed to evaluate two feeding strategies on pork quality in organic farming using 77 non-castrated male pigs (Piétrain × Large White) reared in two batches, each including two groups. Male littermates were allocated to either a Control group (C, n = 37), fed following the organic specifications, or to a group receiving an organic test feed mainly based on French raw materials and containing more fibre and omega-3 fatty acids (Bio+, n = 40). Within batch, each group was reared in one pen from the same building on deep straw bedding with free outdoor access, with ad libitum feeding from around 33 kg until slaughter at around 128 kg of live weight. Loin meat samples were analysed by a trained sensory panel and by SPME-GC-MS to identify the main volatile compounds. Meat from Bio+ pigs showed a significantly more intense red colour (P < 0.01), but lower aromatic persistency (P < 0.05) and tended to be less tender (P = 0.08) than meat from C pigs. None of the samples were qualified as boar tainted. A total of 27 volatile compounds were quantified, with more compounds present in Bio+ pigs, probably due to the greater diversity of raw ingredients in the feeds. The multi-dimensional analyses enabled to observe relationships between volatile compounds and sensory traits but did not differentiate the two feeding strategies. Bio+ feeding strategy compared to C influenced some organoleptic characteristics (red colour of raw meat, aromatic persistency) without modifying the texture, odour and flavour of organic cooked pork.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meat Science
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2025.109869
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does feeding strategy affect the aromatic volatile compounds profile and sensory properties of organic fresh pork?

Bénédicte Lebret, Armelle Prunier, Lucile Montagné, Els Vossen et al.
Meat Science
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

How does feeding strategy affect the aromatic volatile compounds profile and sensory properties of organic fresh pork?

Bénédicte Lebret, Armelle Prunier, Lucile Montagné, Els Vossen, Mohammed Gagaoua, Chloé Van Baelen, Stefaan De Smet
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate two feeding strategies on pork quality in organic farming using 77 non-castrated male pigs (Piétrain × Large White) reared in two batches, each including two groups. Male littermates were allocated to either a Control group (C, n = 37), fed following the organic specifications, or to a group receiving an organic test feed mainly based on French raw materials and containing more fibre and omega-3 fatty acids (Bio+, n = 40). Within batch, each group was reared in one pen from the same building on deep straw bedding with free outdoor access, with ad libitum feeding from around 33 kg until slaughter at around 128 kg of live weight. Loin meat samples were analysed by a trained sensory panel and by SPME-GC-MS to identify the main volatile compounds. Meat from Bio+ pigs showed a significantly more intense red colour (P < 0.01), but lower aromatic persistency (P < 0.05) and tended to be less tender (P = 0.08) than meat from C pigs. None of the samples were qualified as boar tainted. A total of 27 volatile compounds were quantified, with more compounds present in Bio+ pigs, probably due to the greater diversity of raw ingredients in the feeds. The multi-dimensional analyses enabled to observe relationships between volatile compounds and sensory traits but did not differentiate the two feeding strategies. Bio+ feeding strategy compared to C influenced some organoleptic characteristics (red colour of raw meat, aromatic persistency) without modifying the texture, odour and flavour of organic cooked pork.

Meat ScienceVol. 228
HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage (FR), L'Institut Agro (FR)
Universiteit Gent, Région Bretagne, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.