Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol of impact of pharmacist-led antibiotic stewardship audit-feedback intervention

The rise of resistance to antibiotic agents continues to present a substantial challenge to healthcare systems. In response, antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) have been widely endorsed as a core strategy to promote the responsible use of antimicrobials and to curb the progression of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Pharmacist-led audit and feedback interventions hold significant promise due to pharmacists' clinical expertise and direct role in optimizing antimicrobial prescribing. However, despite their potential, the current body of evidence evaluating the effectiveness of pharmacist-led audit and feedback within ASPs remains limited and fragmented. A clearer understanding of their impact is essential to inform policy decisions, support broader implementation, and enhance the overall effectiveness of stewardship efforts. This protocol has been registered with the PROSPERO under the registration number CRD420251036088. The review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.A comprehensive search will be carried out across four major databases, and studies will be selected based on clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The risk of bias in the included studies will be assessed using Cochrane riak of bias assessment tools. Publication bias will be examined using funnel plots and Egger's test. For the quantitative synthesis, a random-effects model will be employed.•This protocol outlines a rigorous plan for conducting a high-quality meta-analysis examining the impact of pharmacist-led audit and feedback interventions within antibiotic stewardship programs.•It details the full methodological framework, from topic selection through to the statistical approaches planned for data synthesis.•By publicly sharing our protocol through an academic publishing platform, we aim to promote transparency, invite constructive input, and contribute to raising the methodological standards for meta-analyses in the domain of antibiotic stewardship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MethodsX
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103399
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol of impact of pharmacist-led antibiotic stewardship audit-feedback intervention

Amer Hayat Khan, Duaa Salem Jawhar, Khurshid Alam
1 citations
MethodsX
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
1.26
article

Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol of impact of pharmacist-led antibiotic stewardship audit-feedback intervention

Amer Hayat Khan, Duaa Salem Jawhar, Khurshid Alam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rise of resistance to antibiotic agents continues to present a substantial challenge to healthcare systems. In response, antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) have been widely endorsed as a core strategy to promote the responsible use of antimicrobials and to curb the progression of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Pharmacist-led audit and feedback interventions hold significant promise due to pharmacists' clinical expertise and direct role in optimizing antimicrobial prescribing. However, despite their potential, the current body of evidence evaluating the effectiveness of pharmacist-led audit and feedback within ASPs remains limited and fragmented. A clearer understanding of their impact is essential to inform policy decisions, support broader implementation, and enhance the overall effectiveness of stewardship efforts. This protocol has been registered with the PROSPERO under the registration number CRD420251036088. The review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.A comprehensive search will be carried out across four major databases, and studies will be selected based on clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The risk of bias in the included studies will be assessed using Cochrane riak of bias assessment tools. Publication bias will be examined using funnel plots and Egger's test. For the quantitative synthesis, a random-effects model will be employed.•This protocol outlines a rigorous plan for conducting a high-quality meta-analysis examining the impact of pharmacist-led audit and feedback interventions within antibiotic stewardship programs.•It details the full methodological framework, from topic selection through to the statistical approaches planned for data synthesis.•By publicly sharing our protocol through an academic publishing platform, we aim to promote transparency, invite constructive input, and contribute to raising the methodological standards for meta-analyses in the domain of antibiotic stewardship.

MethodsXVol. 14
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Ras al-Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.