A PRAGMATIC WORLDVIEW TO MEANINGFUL MATHEMATICS LEARNING AMONG INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ STUDENTS: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION

The academic performance of Indigenous Peoples (IP) students in mathematics often lags due to the lack of culturally responsive teaching approaches and curriculum designs, highlighting a significant research gap. This study aimed to develop and validate a measurement model of meaningful mathematics learning for Indigenous senior high school students, focusing on factors contributing to culturally relevant and effective mathematics education. Using a mixed-methods research design, the study involved Manobo senior high school students from the Davao Region. Data were gathered through surveys and interviews and analyzed through thematic analysis, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The findings revealed four key dimensions of meaningful mathematics learning: Teaching Methods and Understanding, Learning Through Activities and Games, Real-Life Application of Mathematics, and Practice and Mastery. The final model demonstrated strong statistical reliability and validity and was within acceptable thresholds of model fit indices. These dimensions reflect the importance of culturally responsive and student-centered teaching approaches that connect mathematics to real-life contexts and Indigenous cultural practices. The study concludes that meaningful mathematics learning for Indigenous students can be enhanced by integrating cultural relevance, interactive teaching methods, and practical applications into the curriculum.<p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/soc/0175/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education Studies
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i6.5950
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A PRAGMATIC WORLDVIEW TO MEANINGFUL MATHEMATICS LEARNING AMONG INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ STUDENTS: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION

Exequiel R. Gono, Genciano M. Cambalon
European Journal of Education Studies
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

A PRAGMATIC WORLDVIEW TO MEANINGFUL MATHEMATICS LEARNING AMONG INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ STUDENTS: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION

Exequiel R. Gono, Genciano M. Cambalon
article en

Abstract

The academic performance of Indigenous Peoples (IP) students in mathematics often lags due to the lack of culturally responsive teaching approaches and curriculum designs, highlighting a significant research gap. This study aimed to develop and validate a measurement model of meaningful mathematics learning for Indigenous senior high school students, focusing on factors contributing to culturally relevant and effective mathematics education. Using a mixed-methods research design, the study involved Manobo senior high school students from the Davao Region. Data were gathered through surveys and interviews and analyzed through thematic analysis, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The findings revealed four key dimensions of meaningful mathematics learning: Teaching Methods and Understanding, Learning Through Activities and Games, Real-Life Application of Mathematics, and Practice and Mastery. The final model demonstrated strong statistical reliability and validity and was within acceptable thresholds of model fit indices. These dimensions reflect the importance of culturally responsive and student-centered teaching approaches that connect mathematics to real-life contexts and Indigenous cultural practices. The study concludes that meaningful mathematics learning for Indigenous students can be enhanced by integrating cultural relevance, interactive teaching methods, and practical applications into the curriculum.<p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/soc/0175/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>

European Journal of Education StudiesVol. 12(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.