TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN USING MULTIPLE-CHOICE ANSWER SHEETS IN THE 2025 NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION EXAMINATION: A CASE STUDY IN NORTHERN MOUNTAINOUS PROVINCES OF VIETNAM

In the context of the Ministry of Education's reform of question formats and the use of multiple-choice answer sheets in the National High School Graduation Examination from 2025, research into the difficulties students face will help provide appropriate support strategies and practical advice for students during the test-taking process. This study aims to answer two research questions: (1) What difficulties do students encounter when using the current multiple-choice answer sheets? and (2) Is the application of AI in grading multiple-choice exams feasible, and how should it be implemented? The findings reveal that students in the northern mountainous provinces of Vietnam experience significant challenges with the answer sheets, particularly in misfilling answers, time-consuming corrections, and handling short-answer items. Most teachers support replacing answer shading with direct answer writing and highly value the potential of AI in grading. However, concerns remain regarding the accuracy of handwriting recognition and data security, calling for appropriate technical solutions and communication strategies. Through this study, we emphasize the importance of guiding students on commonly mistaken areas and encourage further research and development of AI-based assessment solutions in education.<p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/soc/0908/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v10i2.6016
Primary Topic
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN USING MULTIPLE-CHOICE ANSWER SHEETS IN THE 2025 NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION EXAMINATION: A CASE STUDY IN NORTHERN MOUNTAINOUS PROVINCES OF VIETNAM

Tran Thi Thu, Quang‐Hieu Tran, Nguyễn Thị Thu Phương
European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
article

TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN USING MULTIPLE-CHOICE ANSWER SHEETS IN THE 2025 NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION EXAMINATION: A CASE STUDY IN NORTHERN MOUNTAINOUS PROVINCES OF VIETNAM

Tran Thi Thu, Quang‐Hieu Tran, Nguyễn Thị Thu Phương
article en

Abstract

In the context of the Ministry of Education's reform of question formats and the use of multiple-choice answer sheets in the National High School Graduation Examination from 2025, research into the difficulties students face will help provide appropriate support strategies and practical advice for students during the test-taking process. This study aims to answer two research questions: (1) What difficulties do students encounter when using the current multiple-choice answer sheets? and (2) Is the application of AI in grading multiple-choice exams feasible, and how should it be implemented? The findings reveal that students in the northern mountainous provinces of Vietnam experience significant challenges with the answer sheets, particularly in misfilling answers, time-consuming corrections, and handling short-answer items. Most teachers support replacing answer shading with direct answer writing and highly value the potential of AI in grading. However, concerns remain regarding the accuracy of handwriting recognition and data security, calling for appropriate technical solutions and communication strategies. Through this study, we emphasize the importance of guiding students on commonly mistaken areas and encourage further research and development of AI-based assessment solutions in education.<p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/soc/0908/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>

European Journal of Open Education and E-learning StudiesVol. 10(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.