Project-Based Learning and Critical Thinking Development: A Mixed-Methods Analysis in Undergraduate Education

This mixed-methods study examines the relationship between Project-Based Learning (PBL) and critical thinking development in undergraduate education. A total of 168 students from three universities participated in the research, which employed a mixed-methods design involving pre-post assessments, project artifact analysis, interviews, and focus group discussions across STEM, social sciences, and humanities disciplines. The results indicate statistically significant improvements in critical thinking scores, with mean scores increasing from 68.4 to 74.9 (t(167) = 8.42, p < .001, Cohen's d = 0.54). Notably, humanities students demonstrated the most substantial gains (M = 8.2 points), while analysis and evaluation subscales showed the most significant enhancements. The findings provide compelling evidence that PBL represents a sophisticated pedagogical approach for developing critical thinking skills, facilitating a dynamic, contextual process of cognitive expansion that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Synthesis in Education Journal
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61667/qr0cyd82
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Project-Based Learning and Critical Thinking Development: A Mixed-Methods Analysis in Undergraduate Education

Muhammad Nafi Annury, Naramethi Nananukul, Trinh Minh Hoangh, Nupap Soontarin
2 citations
Global Synthesis in Education Journal
Education and Critical Thinking Development
4.19
article

Project-Based Learning and Critical Thinking Development: A Mixed-Methods Analysis in Undergraduate Education

Muhammad Nafi Annury, Naramethi Nananukul, Trinh Minh Hoangh, Nupap Soontarin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This mixed-methods study examines the relationship between Project-Based Learning (PBL) and critical thinking development in undergraduate education. A total of 168 students from three universities participated in the research, which employed a mixed-methods design involving pre-post assessments, project artifact analysis, interviews, and focus group discussions across STEM, social sciences, and humanities disciplines. The results indicate statistically significant improvements in critical thinking scores, with mean scores increasing from 68.4 to 74.9 (t(167) = 8.42, p < .001, Cohen's d = 0.54). Notably, humanities students demonstrated the most substantial gains (M = 8.2 points), while analysis and evaluation subscales showed the most significant enhancements. The findings provide compelling evidence that PBL represents a sophisticated pedagogical approach for developing critical thinking skills, facilitating a dynamic, contextual process of cognitive expansion that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries

Global Synthesis in Education JournalVol. 2(3)
Thammasat University (TH), Chiang Rai Rajabhat University (TH), Walisongo State Islamic University (ID), Chiangrai College (TH), Hanoi University of Science and Technology (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Project-Based Learning and Critical Thinking Development: A Mixed-Methods Analysis in Undergraduate Education — Muhammad Nafi Annury, Naramethi Nananukul, et al. · Global Synthesis in Education Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS