Does one model fit all mAbs? An evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models

Antibodies are extensively used in treating various diseases, with over 100 canonical monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) approved. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) models are typically developed for each individual mAb, despite their similarities in size, shape, and susceptibility to lysosomal degradation. However, sparse datasets with limited PK information pose challenges in deriving accurate parameter estimates. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of 160 published models of 69 mAbs, administered either intravenously or subcutaneously, examining their structural, statistical, and covariate components. Median estimates for the base parameters are linear clearance (0.22 L/d), central volume (3.42 L), peripheral volume (2.68 L), intercompartmental clearance (0.54 L/d), absorption rate (0.25 L/d), and bioavailability (69%). Using these to simulate a 'generic' mAb results in plausible kinetics with a terminal half-life of 21 ds. We demonstrated that the median linear clearance was 26% lower in models that included nonlinear target-mediated kinetics, when compared to linear models (0.18 vs. 0.25 L/d). For chimeric mAbs median linear clearance was 50% higher compared to fully human and humanized mAbs. Variability in PK parameter estimates across models was comparable to the inter-individual variability, which have consistently shown to be large for mAbs PK (e.g. 55% vs. 43% for clearance and 25% vs. 30% for central volume, respectively). Our meta-analysis suggests that a priori parameter estimates derived from the large body of existing pharmacokinetic models for mAbs are representative for many mAbs and can facilitate the design of new and/or more complex pharmacokinetic models or assist in dose optimization models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
mAbs
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2025.2512217
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does one model fit all mAbs? An evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models

Theo Rispens, Thomas P. C. Dorlo, Stefan Berg, Philine E. A. Adolfsen
1 citations
mAbs
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
2.63
article

Does one model fit all mAbs? An evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models

Theo Rispens, Thomas P. C. Dorlo, Stefan Berg, Philine E. A. Adolfsen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Antibodies are extensively used in treating various diseases, with over 100 canonical monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) approved. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) models are typically developed for each individual mAb, despite their similarities in size, shape, and susceptibility to lysosomal degradation. However, sparse datasets with limited PK information pose challenges in deriving accurate parameter estimates. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of 160 published models of 69 mAbs, administered either intravenously or subcutaneously, examining their structural, statistical, and covariate components. Median estimates for the base parameters are linear clearance (0.22 L/d), central volume (3.42 L), peripheral volume (2.68 L), intercompartmental clearance (0.54 L/d), absorption rate (0.25 L/d), and bioavailability (69%). Using these to simulate a 'generic' mAb results in plausible kinetics with a terminal half-life of 21 ds. We demonstrated that the median linear clearance was 26% lower in models that included nonlinear target-mediated kinetics, when compared to linear models (0.18 vs. 0.25 L/d). For chimeric mAbs median linear clearance was 50% higher compared to fully human and humanized mAbs. Variability in PK parameter estimates across models was comparable to the inter-individual variability, which have consistently shown to be large for mAbs PK (e.g. 55% vs. 43% for clearance and 25% vs. 30% for central volume, respectively). Our meta-analysis suggests that a priori parameter estimates derived from the large body of existing pharmacokinetic models for mAbs are representative for many mAbs and can facilitate the design of new and/or more complex pharmacokinetic models or assist in dose optimization models.

mAbsVol. 17(1)
Uppsala University (SE), Sanquin (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Institute of Infection and Immunity (CA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.