Decoding greenwashing practices toward sustainability: The synergistic influence of governance structure and policy-derive rhetorical strategies

This study empirically examines the nexus between investor pressure, corporate greenwashing practices (CGWPs), corporate governance structure and policy-derive rhetorical strategies (PDRSs). We examine the synergy between corporate governance structure and PDRSs and the combined influence of these two constructs on the nexus between investor pressure and CGWPs. The conceptual framework underpinning this study is rooted on theoretical triangulation, conspicuously on environmental legitimacy theory and rhetorical theory. Datasets employed by this study constructed using Python programming to collect policy-derive texts from Chinese government websites spanning the period (2013−2023), covering 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in China. The PDRSs indicators integrated with the CSMAR database, resulting in two samples: one comprising 29,618 observations from 4820 firms, and the other comprising 30,737 observations from 5187 firms. The results of this study indicate that shareholders returns and stock price volatility significantly influence environmental performance. Higher shareholders returns are associated with high- level of CGWPs. There is positive association between stock price volatility and high level of environmental penalties, particularly under severe PDRSs. Findings reveal that both corporate governance structure and PDRSs moderate the relationship between investor pressure and CGWPs. Further, the synergy between corporate governance structure and PDRSs strengthens their moderating impact on the relationship investor pressure and CGWPs. Furthermore, the synergistic influence of corporate governance and PDRSs mitigates CGWPs, mitigates environmental penalties, and strengthens transparency. Our study adds to the extant literature and sheds lights on the interdependency between governance structure and PDRSs, and their combined moderating impact on investor pressure and CGWPs. Findings of this study have theoretical and managerial implications for individual and institutional investors, boardrooms, policymakers, scholars and other stakeholders. • This study empirically examines the nexus between investors pressure, corporate greenwashing practices (CGWPs), corporate governance structure and policy-derive rhetorical strategies (PDRSs). • Both corporate governance structure and PDRSs moderate the relationship between investors pressure and CGWPs. • The synergy between corporate governance structure and PDRSs strengthens their moderating impact on the relationship between investors pressure and CGWPs. • The synergistic influence of corporate governance and PDRSs mitigates CGWPs, mitigates environmental penalties, and strengthens transparency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108632
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
43.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding greenwashing practices toward sustainability: The synergistic influence of governance structure and policy-derive rhetorical strategies

Ruofei Wang, Wei Wu, Fadi Alkaraan, Yali Fan
21 citations
Energy Economics
Environmental Sustainability in Business
43.52
article

Decoding greenwashing practices toward sustainability: The synergistic influence of governance structure and policy-derive rhetorical strategies

Ruofei Wang, Wei Wu, Fadi Alkaraan, Yali Fan
article en
21 citations

Abstract

This study empirically examines the nexus between investor pressure, corporate greenwashing practices (CGWPs), corporate governance structure and policy-derive rhetorical strategies (PDRSs). We examine the synergy between corporate governance structure and PDRSs and the combined influence of these two constructs on the nexus between investor pressure and CGWPs. The conceptual framework underpinning this study is rooted on theoretical triangulation, conspicuously on environmental legitimacy theory and rhetorical theory. Datasets employed by this study constructed using Python programming to collect policy-derive texts from Chinese government websites spanning the period (2013−2023), covering 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in China. The PDRSs indicators integrated with the CSMAR database, resulting in two samples: one comprising 29,618 observations from 4820 firms, and the other comprising 30,737 observations from 5187 firms. The results of this study indicate that shareholders returns and stock price volatility significantly influence environmental performance. Higher shareholders returns are associated with high- level of CGWPs. There is positive association between stock price volatility and high level of environmental penalties, particularly under severe PDRSs. Findings reveal that both corporate governance structure and PDRSs moderate the relationship between investor pressure and CGWPs. Further, the synergy between corporate governance structure and PDRSs strengthens their moderating impact on the relationship investor pressure and CGWPs. Furthermore, the synergistic influence of corporate governance and PDRSs mitigates CGWPs, mitigates environmental penalties, and strengthens transparency. Our study adds to the extant literature and sheds lights on the interdependency between governance structure and PDRSs, and their combined moderating impact on investor pressure and CGWPs. Findings of this study have theoretical and managerial implications for individual and institutional investors, boardrooms, policymakers, scholars and other stakeholders. • This study empirically examines the nexus between investors pressure, corporate greenwashing practices (CGWPs), corporate governance structure and policy-derive rhetorical strategies (PDRSs). • Both corporate governance structure and PDRSs moderate the relationship between investors pressure and CGWPs. • The synergy between corporate governance structure and PDRSs strengthens their moderating impact on the relationship between investors pressure and CGWPs. • The synergistic influence of corporate governance and PDRSs mitigates CGWPs, mitigates environmental penalties, and strengthens transparency.

Energy EconomicsVol. 148
Nanchang University (CN), Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW), University of Lincoln (GB), Fuzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
43.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.