Validity and Reliability of The Single-Item Kinesiophobia Scale in Persons with Neck and Back Pain

Purpose: Kinesiophobia is a significant concern in persons with neck and back pain. This study aimed to evaluate the measurement properties of the Single-Item Kinesiophobia Scale (SKS) including test-retest reliability and convergent validity. Material and Methods: A total of 101 participants (n=38 with neck pain and n=63 with back pain) were included. The SKS was applied twice 7-14 days apart. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Validity was examined through correlations with established measures: the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TKS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during activity and rest, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Floor/ceiling effects and score distribution were also analyzed. Results: The SKS demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability [neck pain: ICC=0.56 (95%CI: 0.30–0.75), back pain: 0.52 (95%CI: 0.31–0.68)] in the back pain group. It demonstrated moderate correlations with the TKS (rho=0.446-0.555) but small correlations with the VAS (rho=0.261–0.265) and ODI (rho=0.278) in the back pain group. No significant correlations were found between the SKS and VAS or NDI in the neck pain group. Conclusion: The SKS is a simple and feasible screening tool for kinesiophobia but should be used alongside comprehensive measures due to its moderate psychometric properties and limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1630633
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and Reliability of The Single-Item Kinesiophobia Scale in Persons with Neck and Back Pain

Zuhal Abasıyanık, Turhan Kahraman, Yusuf Emük, Seviye Çifitci
Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Validity and Reliability of The Single-Item Kinesiophobia Scale in Persons with Neck and Back Pain

Zuhal Abasıyanık, Turhan Kahraman, Yusuf Emük, Seviye Çifitci
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Kinesiophobia is a significant concern in persons with neck and back pain. This study aimed to evaluate the measurement properties of the Single-Item Kinesiophobia Scale (SKS) including test-retest reliability and convergent validity. Material and Methods: A total of 101 participants (n=38 with neck pain and n=63 with back pain) were included. The SKS was applied twice 7-14 days apart. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Validity was examined through correlations with established measures: the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TKS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during activity and rest, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Floor/ceiling effects and score distribution were also analyzed. Results: The SKS demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability [neck pain: ICC=0.56 (95%CI: 0.30–0.75), back pain: 0.52 (95%CI: 0.31–0.68)] in the back pain group. It demonstrated moderate correlations with the TKS (rho=0.446-0.555) but small correlations with the VAS (rho=0.261–0.265) and ODI (rho=0.278) in the back pain group. No significant correlations were found between the SKS and VAS or NDI in the neck pain group. Conclusion: The SKS is a simple and feasible screening tool for kinesiophobia but should be used alongside comprehensive measures due to its moderate psychometric properties and limitations.

Journal of Basic and Clinical Health SciencesVol. 9(2)
Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.