Medical Support to Irregular Warfare: A Systematic Literature Review, 2000-2024

The advancement in medical care during the past 24 years of IW have enhanced survivability of combatants and noncombatants alike. Unfortunately, challenges remain. The lack of clear IW medicine policy and doctrine has obscured roles, responsibilities, requirements, and capabilities among the various stakeholders within the DoD and beyond. Efforts to advance the provision of medical support in IW have progressed without a cardinal direction or universally shared foundation of knowledge. This research provides a DOTMLPF-P framework to support closing existing gaps and moving forward recommended solutions in the near and long term. Now is the time in this era of potential Large Scale Combat Operations to leverage IW medicine as part of integrated deterrence to mitigate the risk to force and mission while preparing for future conflicts across continents, climates, and geopolitical circumstances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Military Medicine
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf212
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health and Conflict Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medical Support to Irregular Warfare: A Systematic Literature Review, 2000-2024

Derek Licina, Teresa Duquette-Frame, Dallas R Burelison, Ronald D. Hardin et al.
1 citations
Military Medicine
Health and Conflict Studies
2.82
article

Medical Support to Irregular Warfare: A Systematic Literature Review, 2000-2024

Derek Licina, Teresa Duquette-Frame, Dallas R Burelison, Ronald D. Hardin, Chris Gonzalez, Jennifer M. Gurney, Mason H Remondelli, Ryan Leone, Audrey Harris, Paula Cloutier, Michael MacLaren, Chelsea Cherenfant
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The advancement in medical care during the past 24 years of IW have enhanced survivability of combatants and noncombatants alike. Unfortunately, challenges remain. The lack of clear IW medicine policy and doctrine has obscured roles, responsibilities, requirements, and capabilities among the various stakeholders within the DoD and beyond. Efforts to advance the provision of medical support in IW have progressed without a cardinal direction or universally shared foundation of knowledge. This research provides a DOTMLPF-P framework to support closing existing gaps and moving forward recommended solutions in the near and long term. Now is the time in this era of potential Large Scale Combat Operations to leverage IW medicine as part of integrated deterrence to mitigate the risk to force and mission while preparing for future conflicts across continents, climates, and geopolitical circumstances.

Military MedicineVol. 190(11-12)
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), George Washington University (US), Joint Special Operations University (US), Columbia University (US), Joint Base San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Health and Conflict Studies
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.