Moving forward in comparative slavery: Orlando Patterson’s critique of “slave society”, “slave systems”, and the “second slavery”

Orlando Patterson’s critique of the concept of “slave society” in his recent book Enslavement: Past and Present offers us an occasion to reflect upon the use of this term by scholars engaging in studies of comparative slavery in the ancient and modern worlds. It is possible to relate Patterson’s critique of “slave society” to a discussion of the cognate concept of “slave system”, taking inspirations from important recent studies by historians of ancient slavery in comparative perspective. At the same time, it is equally important to keep into account the important comparative work done by an innovative group of scholars on the “second slavery” in the nineteenth-century Atlantic world. Patterson’s concept of dependence as the main feature that defined slavery can help us moving forward in comparative slavery studies by providing guidelines for a comparison of “slave systems”, including the ones that characterized the “second slavery”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnic and Racial Studies
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2025.2504612
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Colonialism, slavery, and trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving forward in comparative slavery: Orlando Patterson’s critique of “slave society”, “slave systems”, and the “second slavery”

Enrico Dal Lago
3 citations
Ethnic and Racial Studies
Colonialism, slavery, and trade
34.04
article

Moving forward in comparative slavery: Orlando Patterson’s critique of “slave society”, “slave systems”, and the “second slavery”

Enrico Dal Lago
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Orlando Patterson’s critique of the concept of “slave society” in his recent book Enslavement: Past and Present offers us an occasion to reflect upon the use of this term by scholars engaging in studies of comparative slavery in the ancient and modern worlds. It is possible to relate Patterson’s critique of “slave society” to a discussion of the cognate concept of “slave system”, taking inspirations from important recent studies by historians of ancient slavery in comparative perspective. At the same time, it is equally important to keep into account the important comparative work done by an innovative group of scholars on the “second slavery” in the nineteenth-century Atlantic world. Patterson’s concept of dependence as the main feature that defined slavery can help us moving forward in comparative slavery studies by providing guidelines for a comparison of “slave systems”, including the ones that characterized the “second slavery”.

Ethnic and Racial StudiesVol. 49(3)
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Colonialism, slavery, and trade
34.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.