Revisiting ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy: A thoughtful analysis in low‐risk and screening naïve Indian antenatal women

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of soft markers on second-trimester sonography in low-risk and screening naïve Indian antenatal women and determine their association with aneuploidy. Soft markers were evaluated through ultrasound, and likelihood ratios (LRs) and modified risk (MR) for aneuploidy were calculated. Pregnant women with a MR >1:250 underwent genetic counseling and invasive testing, whereas those with a lower risk received follow-up. Associations were estimated via Fisher's exact test. A total of 4051 anomaly scans were reviewed, among which 207 (5.1%) women were found to have soft markers (SMs). These included 153 (3.7%) isolated SMs, 43 (1.06%) multiple SMs, and 11 (0.2%) SMs with structural abnormalities. The most common SM was renal pyelectasis. Invasive test uptake increased by 25% among pregnancies with isolated markers and by 55% for those with multiple SMs. A significant association was found between isolated short femur and aneuploidy (p = 0.026), and between multiple SMs and aneuploidy (p = 0.039). Soft markers in low-risk couples can lead to unnecessary invasive testing and anxiety. Genetic counseling is important for discussing relevant factors. Invasive testing for aneuploidies should be based on the modified risk, the presence of multiple SMs, or structural anomalies on ultrasonography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Congenital Anomalies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cga.70011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy: A thoughtful analysis in low‐risk and screening naïve Indian antenatal women

Shreya Das ., Dolat Singh Shekhawat, Pratibha Singh, Garima Yadav et al.
1 citations
Congenital Anomalies
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
3.49
article

Revisiting ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy: A thoughtful analysis in low‐risk and screening naïve Indian antenatal women

Shreya Das ., Dolat Singh Shekhawat, Pratibha Singh, Garima Yadav, Kuldeep Singh, Charu Sharma, Manisha Jhirwal, Manoj Kumar Gupta, Taruna Yadav, Shashank Shekhar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of soft markers on second-trimester sonography in low-risk and screening naïve Indian antenatal women and determine their association with aneuploidy. Soft markers were evaluated through ultrasound, and likelihood ratios (LRs) and modified risk (MR) for aneuploidy were calculated. Pregnant women with a MR >1:250 underwent genetic counseling and invasive testing, whereas those with a lower risk received follow-up. Associations were estimated via Fisher's exact test. A total of 4051 anomaly scans were reviewed, among which 207 (5.1%) women were found to have soft markers (SMs). These included 153 (3.7%) isolated SMs, 43 (1.06%) multiple SMs, and 11 (0.2%) SMs with structural abnormalities. The most common SM was renal pyelectasis. Invasive test uptake increased by 25% among pregnancies with isolated markers and by 55% for those with multiple SMs. A significant association was found between isolated short femur and aneuploidy (p = 0.026), and between multiple SMs and aneuploidy (p = 0.039). Soft markers in low-risk couples can lead to unnecessary invasive testing and anxiety. Genetic counseling is important for discussing relevant factors. Invasive testing for aneuploidies should be based on the modified risk, the presence of multiple SMs, or structural anomalies on ultrasonography.

Congenital AnomaliesVol. 65(1)
Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.