Dagmar Herzog. The Question of Unworthy Life. Eugenics and Germany’s Twentieth Century. Princeton University Press, Princeton (NJ) 2024. 312 pp. Ill. $35.00/£30.00. (E-book: $35.00/£30.00.)

s latest book ties in with her previous work, especially with Unlearning Eugenics: Sexuality, Reproduction, and Disability in Post-Nazi Europe (2018).In the latter, Herzog, distinguished professor at CUNY Graduate Centre and a specialist in modern European history, particularly German history and the history of sexuality and psychoanalysis, explored the connections between abortion and disability in the rhetoric of anti-abortion and feminist activists in the 1960s and 1970s.Herzog pointed out how, across Western Europe, anti-abortion activists referred to the Nazis' mass murder of the disabled to outlaw abortion, but also how advocates of the liberalization of abortion laws mentioned disability as something that could be avoided by legalized abortion.In Unlearning Eugenics, Herzog thus already emphasized the strong and ongoing influence of eugenics as well as, more generally, how the past may haunt present-day reproductive politics.Herzog's latest book returns to eugenics and disability, but now exclusively zooms in on prewar and postwar German views on intellectual disability.Her monograph is impressive, analytical, compassionate, and sometimes utterly baffling.The author explicitly aims to convey her own, and consequently her readers' bafflement, at the ways in which people with intellectual disabilities were regarded as "unworthy life" as early as two decades before the Nazis' mass murder (the T4 killings, or involuntary "euthanasia"), but also, and perhaps more shockingly, decades after the Second World War.Herzog traces the genealogy of the term "unworthy life" and its embedding in eugenics.One of her most important arguments is that it took until the 1980s-1990s before the human rights of disabled people were acknowledged in Germany, and before the Nazi "euthanasia" murders, as well as the 400,000 coerced sterilizations, were recognized as a crime.In the first decades after the war, many Germans continued to think about the intellectually disabled in eugenic and dismissive terms.As Herzog states: "the disabled were not 'forgotten' victims, but rather aggressively repudiated ones" (p.4).The book focuses on "battles over knowledge and meaning" (p.11) on several levels.First, regarding discussions among experts about the "hierarchy" of intellectual disabilities.Second, relating to debates on the value of lives of persons with intellectual disabilities, or rather those labelled as cognitively deficient.Third, these battles over knowledge and meaning also refer to how Germans dealt with the memory of the Nazi "euthanasia" killings, their acknowledgement, and the discussion about reparations for victims of the Nazi sterilization policy.As Herzog points out, the facts of these murders

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Social History
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020859025100527
Primary Topic
History of Science and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dagmar Herzog. The Question of Unworthy Life. Eugenics and Germany’s Twentieth Century. Princeton University Press, Princeton (NJ) 2024. 312 pp. Ill. $35.00/£30.00. (E-book: $35.00/£30.00.)

Willemijn Ruberg
International Review of Social History
History of Science and Medicine
article

Dagmar Herzog. The Question of Unworthy Life. Eugenics and Germany’s Twentieth Century. Princeton University Press, Princeton (NJ) 2024. 312 pp. Ill. $35.00/£30.00. (E-book: $35.00/£30.00.)

Willemijn Ruberg
article en

Abstract

s latest book ties in with her previous work, especially with Unlearning Eugenics: Sexuality, Reproduction, and Disability in Post-Nazi Europe (2018).In the latter, Herzog, distinguished professor at CUNY Graduate Centre and a specialist in modern European history, particularly German history and the history of sexuality and psychoanalysis, explored the connections between abortion and disability in the rhetoric of anti-abortion and feminist activists in the 1960s and 1970s.Herzog pointed out how, across Western Europe, anti-abortion activists referred to the Nazis' mass murder of the disabled to outlaw abortion, but also how advocates of the liberalization of abortion laws mentioned disability as something that could be avoided by legalized abortion.In Unlearning Eugenics, Herzog thus already emphasized the strong and ongoing influence of eugenics as well as, more generally, how the past may haunt present-day reproductive politics.Herzog's latest book returns to eugenics and disability, but now exclusively zooms in on prewar and postwar German views on intellectual disability.Her monograph is impressive, analytical, compassionate, and sometimes utterly baffling.The author explicitly aims to convey her own, and consequently her readers' bafflement, at the ways in which people with intellectual disabilities were regarded as "unworthy life" as early as two decades before the Nazis' mass murder (the T4 killings, or involuntary "euthanasia"), but also, and perhaps more shockingly, decades after the Second World War.Herzog traces the genealogy of the term "unworthy life" and its embedding in eugenics.One of her most important arguments is that it took until the 1980s-1990s before the human rights of disabled people were acknowledged in Germany, and before the Nazi "euthanasia" murders, as well as the 400,000 coerced sterilizations, were recognized as a crime.In the first decades after the war, many Germans continued to think about the intellectually disabled in eugenic and dismissive terms.As Herzog states: "the disabled were not 'forgotten' victims, but rather aggressively repudiated ones" (p.4).The book focuses on "battles over knowledge and meaning" (p.11) on several levels.First, regarding discussions among experts about the "hierarchy" of intellectual disabilities.Second, relating to debates on the value of lives of persons with intellectual disabilities, or rather those labelled as cognitively deficient.Third, these battles over knowledge and meaning also refer to how Germans dealt with the memory of the Nazi "euthanasia" killings, their acknowledgement, and the discussion about reparations for victims of the Nazi sterilization policy.As Herzog points out, the facts of these murders

International Review of Social HistoryVol. 70(1)
Utrecht University (NL), University of the Arts Utrecht (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
History of Science and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.