The myth of middle-class proletarianisation: Defining and examining class in Sweden from a neo-Marxist perspective

Since the 2007–2008 financial crisis, it has been suggested that the middle class is undergoing proletarianisation, with stagnant wages and reduced work autonomy making their conditions more like those of the working class. However, there is no consensus on whether this shift has occurred or on how to define the two classes. This article proposes a class concept rooted in value domination, which compels individuals to the market for survival. While both classes depend on the market, the middle class is defined by their greater individual market power and a labour power with higher value, resulting in higher wages and better working conditions. Using this definition, the proletarianisation thesis is examined in Sweden. Findings indicate a widening wage gap, with middle class wages diverging from those of the working class, and no significant reduction in middle class autonomy relative to the working class. These results suggest that proletarianisation has not occurred, and class distinctions have, in fact, intensified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Capital & Class
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168251341166
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The myth of middle-class proletarianisation: Defining and examining class in Sweden from a neo-Marxist perspective

Johan Alfonsson
1 citations
Capital & Class
Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
4.20
article

The myth of middle-class proletarianisation: Defining and examining class in Sweden from a neo-Marxist perspective

Johan Alfonsson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since the 2007–2008 financial crisis, it has been suggested that the middle class is undergoing proletarianisation, with stagnant wages and reduced work autonomy making their conditions more like those of the working class. However, there is no consensus on whether this shift has occurred or on how to define the two classes. This article proposes a class concept rooted in value domination, which compels individuals to the market for survival. While both classes depend on the market, the middle class is defined by their greater individual market power and a labour power with higher value, resulting in higher wages and better working conditions. Using this definition, the proletarianisation thesis is examined in Sweden. Findings indicate a widening wage gap, with middle class wages diverging from those of the working class, and no significant reduction in middle class autonomy relative to the working class. These results suggest that proletarianisation has not occurred, and class distinctions have, in fact, intensified.

Capital & Class
Halmstad University (SE)
Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The myth of middle-class proletarianisation: Defining and examining class in Sweden from a neo-Marxist perspective — Johan Alfonsson · Capital & Class (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS