Construction and Validation of Artificial Neural Network Model Suggesting Nursing Diagnosis

There are challenges involving human resource management, as the selection and evaluation processes for nursing diagnostic labels are time-consuming, resulting in an excessive workload. This, in turn, can lead to insufficient attention being given to patients' medical issues. As a proof of concept, to solve challenges related to nursing diagnoses, we developed an artificial neural network model using progress records and evaluated its performance. Specifically, datasets were obtained from progress record data from the critical care department system in Japan between 2014 and 2019 and the corresponding nursing diagnosis data from electronic medical records. The model was trained, and its performance was evaluated. We compared several methods for vectorizing progress records and evaluated performance with and without oversampling for imbalanced data. We used a naive Bayes classifier for comparison. The model using term frequency-inverse document frequency achieved the highest values for both accuracy and the area under the precision-recall curve across all target nursing diagnoses (accuracy = 0.705-0.911; area under the precision-recall curve = 0.387-0.929). The artificial neural network model outperformed the naive Bayes classifier in both accuracy and area under the precision-recall curve, which indicated its superiority as a classifier.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CIN Computers Informatics Nursing
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000001293
Primary Topic
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction and Validation of Artificial Neural Network Model Suggesting Nursing Diagnosis

Kengo Miyo, Masamichi Ishii, Shinichiroh Yokota, Kimikazu Kashiwagi et al.
CIN Computers Informatics Nursing
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
article

Construction and Validation of Artificial Neural Network Model Suggesting Nursing Diagnosis

Kengo Miyo, Masamichi Ishii, Shinichiroh Yokota, Kimikazu Kashiwagi, Ryota Nishi
article en

Abstract

There are challenges involving human resource management, as the selection and evaluation processes for nursing diagnostic labels are time-consuming, resulting in an excessive workload. This, in turn, can lead to insufficient attention being given to patients' medical issues. As a proof of concept, to solve challenges related to nursing diagnoses, we developed an artificial neural network model using progress records and evaluated its performance. Specifically, datasets were obtained from progress record data from the critical care department system in Japan between 2014 and 2019 and the corresponding nursing diagnosis data from electronic medical records. The model was trained, and its performance was evaluated. We compared several methods for vectorizing progress records and evaluated performance with and without oversampling for imbalanced data. We used a naive Bayes classifier for comparison. The model using term frequency-inverse document frequency achieved the highest values for both accuracy and the area under the precision-recall curve across all target nursing diagnoses (accuracy = 0.705-0.911; area under the precision-recall curve = 0.387-0.929). The artificial neural network model outperformed the naive Bayes classifier in both accuracy and area under the precision-recall curve, which indicated its superiority as a classifier.

CIN Computers Informatics NursingVol. 43(6)
National Center for Global Health and Medicine (JP), Miyata Eye Hospital (JP), National Institute of Technology, Miyakonojo College (JP), Miyoshi Kasei (Japan) (JP), Kashiwa Municipal Hospital (JP)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.