From data lifecycle to research activity model: research data management in data-intensive social sciences and humanities research

Purpose The aim of this study is to examine research data management practices among scholars in the social sciences and humanities who engage in data-intensive research. Additionally, the study extends an existing data lifecycle model tailored to these disciplines by incorporating scholars’ perceived needs for research data support services. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews ( n = 21) were conducted with scholars of various levels of experience in data-intensive social sciences and humanities research. A qualitative content analysis focused on research data management practices was applied to the material. Findings Unmet needs in terms of existing infrastructure (e.g. repositories) and services are affecting the research data management practices in data-intensive social sciences and humanities research, where less common tasks include data sharing and reuse. Based on these perceived requirements, an improved version of the Data Documentation Initiative Lifecycle that includes the support needs required for effectively managing data throughout the research process is developed. Originality/value The study contributes to improving the development of research data services aimed at data-intensive social sciences and humanities research by presenting a research activity model that better represents from the perspective of scholars the evolving research data management practices in these disciplines. The study also provides a deeper understanding of the support needs derived from the increasing digitalization of social sciences and humanities research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-12-2024-0959
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From data lifecycle to research activity model: research data management in data-intensive social sciences and humanities research

Anna Sendra, Elina Late, Sanna Kumpulainen
6 citations
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Research Data Management Practices
19.48
article

From data lifecycle to research activity model: research data management in data-intensive social sciences and humanities research

Anna Sendra, Elina Late, Sanna Kumpulainen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study is to examine research data management practices among scholars in the social sciences and humanities who engage in data-intensive research. Additionally, the study extends an existing data lifecycle model tailored to these disciplines by incorporating scholars’ perceived needs for research data support services. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews ( n = 21) were conducted with scholars of various levels of experience in data-intensive social sciences and humanities research. A qualitative content analysis focused on research data management practices was applied to the material. Findings Unmet needs in terms of existing infrastructure (e.g. repositories) and services are affecting the research data management practices in data-intensive social sciences and humanities research, where less common tasks include data sharing and reuse. Based on these perceived requirements, an improved version of the Data Documentation Initiative Lifecycle that includes the support needs required for effectively managing data throughout the research process is developed. Originality/value The study contributes to improving the development of research data services aimed at data-intensive social sciences and humanities research by presenting a research activity model that better represents from the perspective of scholars the evolving research data management practices in these disciplines. The study also provides a deeper understanding of the support needs derived from the increasing digitalization of social sciences and humanities research.

Aslib Journal of Information Management
Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Research Data Management Practices
19.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.