Validation of WRF-Simulated North Sea Wind Fields: A Comparative Analysis with Observations at LEG and EPL Platforms

Abstract This study evaluates the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model’s ability to simulate wind fields in the North Sea, using lidar data from the Europlatform (EPL) and Lichteiland Goeree (LEG) platforms. Three nested domain configurations with increasing resolution (18 km to 0.5 km) were tested over a 23-day period to assess spatial and temporal resolution impacts. Case 0 (18/6/2 km), Case 1 (9/3/1 km), and Case 2 (3/1.5/0.5 km) used the MYNN planetary boundary layer scheme and Fitch wind farm parameterization. Case 2 showed the strongest agreement with observed wind speed (correlation: 0.87–0.88) and direction (0.88). Wake impact analysis highlighted strengths and limitations in WRF’s representation of wind farm effects. All cases captured the peak in wind speed ratio (ΔWSR) around 200°–250°, where LEG is primarily affected by the wake, with Case 0 aligning best with observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics Conference Series
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3016/1/012053
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of WRF-Simulated North Sea Wind Fields: A Comparative Analysis with Observations at LEG and EPL Platforms

Kisorthman Vimalakanthan, E.T.G. Bot, W.P. Engels
Journal of Physics Conference Series
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
article

Validation of WRF-Simulated North Sea Wind Fields: A Comparative Analysis with Observations at LEG and EPL Platforms

Kisorthman Vimalakanthan, E.T.G. Bot, W.P. Engels
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model’s ability to simulate wind fields in the North Sea, using lidar data from the Europlatform (EPL) and Lichteiland Goeree (LEG) platforms. Three nested domain configurations with increasing resolution (18 km to 0.5 km) were tested over a 23-day period to assess spatial and temporal resolution impacts. Case 0 (18/6/2 km), Case 1 (9/3/1 km), and Case 2 (3/1.5/0.5 km) used the MYNN planetary boundary layer scheme and Fitch wind farm parameterization. Case 2 showed the strongest agreement with observed wind speed (correlation: 0.87–0.88) and direction (0.88). Wake impact analysis highlighted strengths and limitations in WRF’s representation of wind farm effects. All cases captured the peak in wind speed ratio (ΔWSR) around 200°–250°, where LEG is primarily affected by the wake, with Case 0 aligning best with observations.

Journal of Physics Conference SeriesVol. 3016(1)
Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validation of WRF-Simulated North Sea Wind Fields: A Comparative Analysis with Observations at LEG and EPL Platforms — Kisorthman Vimalakanthan, E.T.G. Bot, et al. · Journal of Physics Conference Series (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS