Coarse, fast, and still accurate? Comparing corrections for the actuator line model

Abstract The actuator line method for modeling wind turbine blades in wind farm flow simulations often offers a good compromise between accuracy and computational cost. A variety of methods have been proposed to correct the force prediction by the actuator line near the tip and root due to smearing the force in the flow domain. This article compares the two most commonly used methods (the filtered lifting line and the vortex-based smearing correction) in terms of accuracy, applicability and computational performance. Both corrections perform well for a single turbine, significantly reducing the force and power overprediction. The effect on power is larger than on thrust. Applying the corrections leads to more accurate results even at lower resolutions. The application of the corrections in an ALM simulation of a wind farm with 30 turbines reduces power by up to 10% compared to a case without correction. Different turbines in the farm are affected differently. The improvements in accuracy due to the corrections far outweigh the additional computational cost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics Conference Series
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3016/1/012051
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coarse, fast, and still accurate? Comparing corrections for the actuator line model

H. Korb, Emanuel Taschner
Journal of Physics Conference Series
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
article

Coarse, fast, and still accurate? Comparing corrections for the actuator line model

H. Korb, Emanuel Taschner
article en

Abstract

Abstract The actuator line method for modeling wind turbine blades in wind farm flow simulations often offers a good compromise between accuracy and computational cost. A variety of methods have been proposed to correct the force prediction by the actuator line near the tip and root due to smearing the force in the flow domain. This article compares the two most commonly used methods (the filtered lifting line and the vortex-based smearing correction) in terms of accuracy, applicability and computational performance. Both corrections perform well for a single turbine, significantly reducing the force and power overprediction. The effect on power is larger than on thrust. Applying the corrections leads to more accurate results even at lower resolutions. The application of the corrections in an ALM simulation of a wind farm with 30 turbines reduces power by up to 10% compared to a case without correction. Different turbines in the farm are affected differently. The improvements in accuracy due to the corrections far outweigh the additional computational cost.

Journal of Physics Conference SeriesVol. 3016(1)
Uppsala University (SE), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Coarse, fast, and still accurate? Comparing corrections for the actuator line model — H. Korb, Emanuel Taschner · Journal of Physics Conference Series (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS