ON THE UNCERTAINTIES IN ROCK-ARMOURED BREAKWATERS STABILITY

Design of the armour of rubble mound breakwaters has historically been based on empirical equations relating armour stone movement resistance to wave-induced forces. These empirical equations are developed primarily from small-scale laboratory studies and show considerable uncertainty. While new relations have been introduced to expand ranges of application, little progress has been made in several decades to decrease equation uncertainty. There is still no consensus on the best design equation and its field of application. The design manuals, such as the Coastal Engineering Manual (USACE (2002)) and the Rock Manual (CIRIA, CUR, CETMEF (2007)), show overlap between formulas and new formulas have been introduced since these manuals were published, creating design uncertainty. A clear understanding of the relative magnitudes of epistemic and aleatory uncertainty could better focus studies to improve physics research. As a first step, the present study investigates the influence of hydrodynamic uncertainty from laboratory wave and water level measurements on the predictive models using a validated 1-D Boussinesq numerical model.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Coastal Engineering Proceedings
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v38.structures.28
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ON THE UNCERTAINTIES IN ROCK-ARMOURED BREAKWATERS STABILITY

Alessandra Saponieri, Giuseppe Roberto Tomasicchio, Jeffrey A. Melby, Giulio Scaravaglione et al.
Coastal Engineering Proceedings
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

ON THE UNCERTAINTIES IN ROCK-ARMOURED BREAKWATERS STABILITY

Alessandra Saponieri, Giuseppe Roberto Tomasicchio, Jeffrey A. Melby, Giulio Scaravaglione, Leonardo Damiani
article en

Abstract

Design of the armour of rubble mound breakwaters has historically been based on empirical equations relating armour stone movement resistance to wave-induced forces. These empirical equations are developed primarily from small-scale laboratory studies and show considerable uncertainty. While new relations have been introduced to expand ranges of application, little progress has been made in several decades to decrease equation uncertainty. There is still no consensus on the best design equation and its field of application. The design manuals, such as the Coastal Engineering Manual (USACE (2002)) and the Rock Manual (CIRIA, CUR, CETMEF (2007)), show overlap between formulas and new formulas have been introduced since these manuals were published, creating design uncertainty. A clear understanding of the relative magnitudes of epistemic and aleatory uncertainty could better focus studies to improve physics research. As a first step, the present study investigates the influence of hydrodynamic uncertainty from laboratory wave and water level measurements on the predictive models using a validated 1-D Boussinesq numerical model.

Coastal Engineering Proceedings(38)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.