Influence of Testing Temperature on the Mechanical Performance of Brazed Conventionally and Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel Joints

In this work, brazed joints between samples of 316L stainless steel (316LSS) are formed using the Ag155 brazing filler metal. As an additional aspect of the investigation, the joints combine stainless steel formed by conventional processing and by additive manufacture (AM). These samples are then tested to determine their shear response with temperature, employing a bespoke test design comprising a set of three cylindrical samples held together with two brazed joints. Multiple samples are tested at 20 and 500 °C and single samples at intermediate temperatures. A shear strength above 200 MPa is retained up until 200 °C, and, despite significant differences in steel microstructure, the conventional or AM processing of the 316LSS does not affect joint failure. At higher temperatures, there is a progressive decrease in both the failure strength and the ductility of the joint. The reasons for the behavior are traced to changes, potentially associated with a transformed layer in the steel near to the joint, in the operating failure mechanism as determined by observations of the failure surfaces of the joints. These results highlight the importance of systematic investigations of the strength of brazed joints with temperature and correlation of these to the joint microstructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Materials
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202500323
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Testing Temperature on the Mechanical Performance of Brazed Conventionally and Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel Joints

Raphaël Charvet, Iain Todd, Russell Goodall, S. C. Barwick et al.
Advanced Engineering Materials
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Influence of Testing Temperature on the Mechanical Performance of Brazed Conventionally and Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel Joints

Raphaël Charvet, Iain Todd, Russell Goodall, S. C. Barwick, Frances Livera, Dennis Premoli, Andreas Mortensen, Neil Hind
article en

Abstract

In this work, brazed joints between samples of 316L stainless steel (316LSS) are formed using the Ag155 brazing filler metal. As an additional aspect of the investigation, the joints combine stainless steel formed by conventional processing and by additive manufacture (AM). These samples are then tested to determine their shear response with temperature, employing a bespoke test design comprising a set of three cylindrical samples held together with two brazed joints. Multiple samples are tested at 20 and 500 °C and single samples at intermediate temperatures. A shear strength above 200 MPa is retained up until 200 °C, and, despite significant differences in steel microstructure, the conventional or AM processing of the 316LSS does not affect joint failure. At higher temperatures, there is a progressive decrease in both the failure strength and the ductility of the joint. The reasons for the behavior are traced to changes, potentially associated with a transformed layer in the steel near to the joint, in the operating failure mechanism as determined by observations of the failure surfaces of the joints. These results highlight the importance of systematic investigations of the strength of brazed joints with temperature and correlation of these to the joint microstructure.

Advanced Engineering MaterialsVol. 27(13)
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), University of Sheffield (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Henry Royce Institute, Science Foundation Ireland, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.