Bridging Real and Simulated Flight Training: A Quantitative Evaluation of BSAT Students’ Experiences at Indiana Aerospace University

This study evaluated the effectiveness and perceived differences between actual and simulated flight training among Bachelor of Science in Aviation Technology (BSAT) students at Indiana Aerospace University (IAU) for Academic Year 2023–2024. Employing a descriptive quantitative research design, the researchers gathered data from 50 aviation students through structured surveys using a five-point Likert scale. The goal was to determine how each training mode—simulated and actual—contributed to student learning, skill development, and readiness for real-world aviation scenarios. The findings revealed that students strongly agreed that actual and simulated flight training were practical in building flying competencies. The educational setting at IAU successfully integrated both modalities, offering consistent instruction and reinforcement of aviation concepts. High weighted mean scores across all indicators, particularly in training, educational attainment, and flight experience, confirmed the program’s effectiveness. Students noted significant benefits in their practical skills, understanding of aviation theory, and overall flight preparedness due to combined exposure to real and virtual environments. Despite the overall effectiveness of the program, areas for improvement were identified. These included improved simulation realism, updated flight instruments, better replication of in-flight conditions, and tighter alignment between theoretical and simulation instruction. The study recommends investing in advanced full-motion simulators, incorporating VR/AR systems, and updating training protocols to enhance the fidelity and instructional value of simulator experiences. By addressing these areas, IAU can further strengthen its curriculum and better equip its students for the complex demands of modern aviation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Studies in Aviation Aerospace and Management
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70838/jasaam.010205
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging Real and Simulated Flight Training: A Quantitative Evaluation of BSAT Students’ Experiences at Indiana Aerospace University

Ray Agan, Eugene Toring, Jhoselle Tus, Kimberly Toring et al.
Journal of Advanced Studies in Aviation Aerospace and Management
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Bridging Real and Simulated Flight Training: A Quantitative Evaluation of BSAT Students’ Experiences at Indiana Aerospace University

Ray Agan, Eugene Toring, Jhoselle Tus, Kimberly Toring, Juan Luis Zamora Macho, Kent John Tizon, Glenn Dongallo, John Lloyd Aranas, Sam Hesley Albaciete, Manuel Julian Mj Labrague, Gem Christian Largo, Angelo John Pepito, Nessa Krystal Leiz Ripalda
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness and perceived differences between actual and simulated flight training among Bachelor of Science in Aviation Technology (BSAT) students at Indiana Aerospace University (IAU) for Academic Year 2023–2024. Employing a descriptive quantitative research design, the researchers gathered data from 50 aviation students through structured surveys using a five-point Likert scale. The goal was to determine how each training mode—simulated and actual—contributed to student learning, skill development, and readiness for real-world aviation scenarios. The findings revealed that students strongly agreed that actual and simulated flight training were practical in building flying competencies. The educational setting at IAU successfully integrated both modalities, offering consistent instruction and reinforcement of aviation concepts. High weighted mean scores across all indicators, particularly in training, educational attainment, and flight experience, confirmed the program’s effectiveness. Students noted significant benefits in their practical skills, understanding of aviation theory, and overall flight preparedness due to combined exposure to real and virtual environments. Despite the overall effectiveness of the program, areas for improvement were identified. These included improved simulation realism, updated flight instruments, better replication of in-flight conditions, and tighter alignment between theoretical and simulation instruction. The study recommends investing in advanced full-motion simulators, incorporating VR/AR systems, and updating training protocols to enhance the fidelity and instructional value of simulator experiences. By addressing these areas, IAU can further strengthen its curriculum and better equip its students for the complex demands of modern aviation.

Journal of Advanced Studies in Aviation Aerospace and ManagementVol. 1(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.