Determining Human Factors in Aviation among Indiana Aersopace University Pilots

This study aimed to determine the key human factors influencing aviation performance among pilots at Indiana Aerospace University (IAU), focusing on training and flight simulation, safety culture, and workload management. Using a descriptive quantitative research design, the study employed a self-made questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale to gather data from 50 participants across five pilot groups: student pilots, private pilots, commercial pilots, ground instructors, and flight instructors. Stratified random sampling ensured that all pilot categories were adequately represented. Data were collected through face-to-face distribution of surveys and analyzed using weighted mean and ranking methods. Findings revealed that IAU pilots strongly agreed on the significance of human factors in aviation safety and performance. Regarding safety culture, pilots recognized a well-established system that promotes open communication, mutual respect, and a supportive reporting environment. Workload management, while generally effective, showed areas for improvement, particularly in shift scheduling and institutional support systems to prevent fatigue. Training and simulation programs were also rated highly, especially for their effectiveness in reducing errors and preparing pilots for in-flight emergencies. However, pilots suggested improvements in simulation realism and continuous updates to training standards to match current aviation demands. The study concluded that addressing human factors such as training quality, effective workload distribution, and a robust safety culture is essential for minimizing human error and enhancing overall aviation outcomes. It recommends that IAU adopt more flexible academic policies during flight periods, improve flight scheduling systems, enhance simulator fidelity, and promote a just culture for safety reporting. These strategies will strengthen pilot preparedness, reduce risk, and reinforce IAU’s position as a leading institution in aviation education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Studies in Aviation Aerospace and Management
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70838/jasaam.010206
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining Human Factors in Aviation among Indiana Aersopace University Pilots

Eugene Toring, Jhoselle Tus, Kimberly Toring, Guido Guanzon et al.
Journal of Advanced Studies in Aviation Aerospace and Management
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Determining Human Factors in Aviation among Indiana Aersopace University Pilots

Eugene Toring, Jhoselle Tus, Kimberly Toring, Guido Guanzon, Vince Andre Salang, Alexis Rhey Limboy, Zeus Kyle Caalim, Welbert Bahinting, Leory Ozias Abranilla, Justine Dirk Lapiña, Aristotle Hosea Lacno, Carl Japheth Gumapang, Raven Layan
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the key human factors influencing aviation performance among pilots at Indiana Aerospace University (IAU), focusing on training and flight simulation, safety culture, and workload management. Using a descriptive quantitative research design, the study employed a self-made questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale to gather data from 50 participants across five pilot groups: student pilots, private pilots, commercial pilots, ground instructors, and flight instructors. Stratified random sampling ensured that all pilot categories were adequately represented. Data were collected through face-to-face distribution of surveys and analyzed using weighted mean and ranking methods. Findings revealed that IAU pilots strongly agreed on the significance of human factors in aviation safety and performance. Regarding safety culture, pilots recognized a well-established system that promotes open communication, mutual respect, and a supportive reporting environment. Workload management, while generally effective, showed areas for improvement, particularly in shift scheduling and institutional support systems to prevent fatigue. Training and simulation programs were also rated highly, especially for their effectiveness in reducing errors and preparing pilots for in-flight emergencies. However, pilots suggested improvements in simulation realism and continuous updates to training standards to match current aviation demands. The study concluded that addressing human factors such as training quality, effective workload distribution, and a robust safety culture is essential for minimizing human error and enhancing overall aviation outcomes. It recommends that IAU adopt more flexible academic policies during flight periods, improve flight scheduling systems, enhance simulator fidelity, and promote a just culture for safety reporting. These strategies will strengthen pilot preparedness, reduce risk, and reinforce IAU’s position as a leading institution in aviation education.

Journal of Advanced Studies in Aviation Aerospace and ManagementVol. 1(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.